Literature DB >> 28736464

The Generalized Higher Criticism for Testing SNP-Set Effects in Genetic Association Studies.

Ian Barnett1, Rajarshi Mukherjee2, Xihong Lin1.   

Abstract

It is of substantial interest to study the effects of genes, genetic pathways, and networks on the risk of complex diseases. These genetic constructs each contain multiple SNPs, which are often correlated and function jointly, and might be large in number. However, only a sparse subset of SNPs in a genetic construct is generally associated with the disease of interest. In this article, we propose the generalized higher criticism (GHC) to test for the association between an SNP set and a disease outcome. The higher criticism is a test traditionally used in high-dimensional signal detection settings when marginal test statistics are independent and the number of parameters is very large. However, these assumptions do not always hold in genetic association studies, due to linkage disequilibrium among SNPs and the finite number of SNPs in an SNP set in each genetic construct. The proposed GHC overcomes the limitations of the higher criticism by allowing for arbitrary correlation structures among the SNPs in an SNP-set, while performing accurate analytic p-value calculations for any finite number of SNPs in the SNP-set. We obtain the detection boundary of the GHC test. We compared empirically using simulations the power of the GHC method with existing SNP-set tests over a range of genetic regions with varied correlation structures and signal sparsity. We apply the proposed methods to analyze the CGEM breast cancer genome-wide association study. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlated test statistics; Detection boundary; Genetic association testing; Higher criticism; Multiple hypothesis testing; Signal detection

Year:  2017        PMID: 28736464      PMCID: PMC5517103          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1192039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  23 in total

1.  Fast and Accurate Approximation to Significance Tests in Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Jun S Liu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Optimal tests for rare variant effects in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Michael C Wu; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Powerful SNP-set analysis for case-control genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Peter Kraft; Michael P Epstein; Deanne M Taylor; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  So many correlated tests, so little time! Rapid adjustment of P values for multiple correlated tests.

Authors:  Karen N Conneely; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  On multiple-testing correction in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Valentina Moskvina; Karl Michael Schmidt
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  The effect of correlation in false discovery rate estimation.

Authors:  Armin Schwartzman; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Analytic P-value calculation for the higher criticism test in finite d problems.

Authors:  Ian J Barnett; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.445

9.  Association of polymorphisms in the paraoxonase 1 gene with breast cancer incidence in the CPS-II Nutrition Cohort.

Authors:  Victoria L Stevens; Carmen Rodriguez; Alexandre L Pavluck; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SPARSE BINARY REGRESSION.

Authors:  Rajarshi Mukherjee; Natesh S Pillai; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.028

View more
  20 in total

1.  ACAT: A Fast and Powerful p Value Combination Method for Rare-Variant Analysis in Sequencing Studies.

Authors:  Yaowu Liu; Sixing Chen; Zilin Li; Alanna C Morrison; Eric Boerwinkle; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Beyond smartphones and sensors: choosing appropriate statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data.

Authors:  Ian Barnett; John Torous; Patrick Staples; Matcheri Keshavan; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Optimal detection of weak positive latent dependence between two sequences of multiple tests.

Authors:  Sihai Dave Zhao; T Tony Cai; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 1.473

4.  Identification of differentially expressed gene sets using the Generalized Berk-Jones statistic.

Authors:  Sheila M Gaynor; Ryan Sun; Xihong Lin; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Genetic Variant Set-Based Tests Using the Generalized Berk-Jones Statistic with Application to a Genome-Wide Association Study of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan Sun; Xihong Lin
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  A powerful microbial group association test based on the higher criticism analysis for sparse microbial association signals.

Authors:  Hyunwook Koh; Ni Zhao
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 14.650

7.  Effective SNP ranking improves the performance of eQTL mapping.

Authors:  X Jessie Jeng; Jacob Rhyne; Teng Zhang; Jung-Ying Tzeng
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic p-value calculation under arbitrary dependency structures.

Authors:  Yaowu Liu; Jun Xie
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Convex combination sequence kernel association test for rare-variant studies.

Authors:  Daniel C Posner; Honghuang Lin; James B Meigs; Eric D Kolaczyk; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  A unifying framework for rare variant association testing in family-based designs, including higher criticism approaches, SKATs, and burden tests.

Authors:  Julian Hecker; F William Townes; Priyadarshini Kachroo; Cecelia Laurie; Jessica Lasky-Su; John Ziniti; Michael H Cho; Scott T Weiss; Nan M Laird; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.