Ziho Lee1, Benjamin T Waldorf2, Eric Y Cho2, Jeffrey C Liu2, Michael J Metro2, Daniel D Eun2. 1. Department of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Otolaryngology (JCL), Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: Ziho.Lee@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Otolaryngology (JCL), Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgical management of proximal and mid ureteral strictures that are not amenable to primary excision and anastomosis is challenging. Although a buccal mucosa graft is commonly used during substitution urethroplasty, its use in substitution ureteroplasty is limited. We describe our technique of robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft to manage complex ureteral strictures and we report our outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 12 patients who underwent robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft between September 2014 and June 2016. The indication for the procedure was a proximal or mid ureteral stricture not amenable to primary excision and anastomosis. The primary outcomes were clinical success, absent symptoms on ureteral pathology and radiological success, defined as absent ureteral obstruction on retrograde pyelography, renal scan and/or computerized tomography. RESULTS: Four of the 12 patients (33.3%) had a ureteropelvic junction stricture, 4 (33.3%) had a proximal stricture and 4 (33.3%) had a mid ureteral stricture. Eight of the 12 patients (66.7%) had previously undergone failed ureteral reconstruction. Median stricture length was 3 cm (range 2 to 5). Median operative time was 217 minutes (range 136 to 344) and mean estimated blood loss was 100 ml (range 50 to 200). Median length of stay was 1 day (range 1 to 6). At a median followup of 13 months (range 4 to 30) 10 of the 12 cases (83.3%) were clinically and radiologically successful. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft is associated with low inherent morbidity. It is an effective way to manage complex proximal and mid ureteral strictures.
PURPOSE: Surgical management of proximal and mid ureteral strictures that are not amenable to primary excision and anastomosis is challenging. Although a buccal mucosa graft is commonly used during substitution urethroplasty, its use in substitution ureteroplasty is limited. We describe our technique of robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft to manage complex ureteral strictures and we report our outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 12 patients who underwent robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft between September 2014 and June 2016. The indication for the procedure was a proximal or mid ureteral stricture not amenable to primary excision and anastomosis. The primary outcomes were clinical success, absent symptoms on ureteral pathology and radiological success, defined as absent ureteral obstruction on retrograde pyelography, renal scan and/or computerized tomography. RESULTS: Four of the 12 patients (33.3%) had a ureteropelvic junction stricture, 4 (33.3%) had a proximal stricture and 4 (33.3%) had a mid ureteral stricture. Eight of the 12 patients (66.7%) had previously undergone failed ureteral reconstruction. Median stricture length was 3 cm (range 2 to 5). Median operative time was 217 minutes (range 136 to 344) and mean estimated blood loss was 100 ml (range 50 to 200). Median length of stay was 1 day (range 1 to 6). At a median followup of 13 months (range 4 to 30) 10 of the 12 cases (83.3%) were clinically and radiologically successful. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic ureteroplasty with a buccal mucosa graft is associated with low inherent morbidity. It is an effective way to manage complex proximal and mid ureteral strictures.
Authors: Matthew Lee; Ziho Lee; Helaine Koster; Minsuk Jun; Aeen M Asghar; Randall Lee; David Strauss; Neel Patel; Daniel Kim; Sreeya Komaravolu; Alice Drain; Michael J Metro; Lee Zhao; Michael Stifelman; Daniel D Eun Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2020-11-12
Authors: Shengwei Xiong; Jie Wang; Weijie Zhu; Kunlin Yang; Guangpu Ding; Xuesong Li; Daniel D Eun Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Lukas John Hefermehl; Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Kretschmer; Vincent Beck; Christian G Stief; Boris Schlenker; Frank Strittmatter Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2020-03-09