Literature DB >> 28735894

Geographical variation and trends in outcomes of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with or without splenic vessel preservation: A meta-analysis.

Hua Yongfei1, Ammar A Javed2, Richard Burkhart2, Niek A Peters3, Alina Hasanain2, Matthew J Weiss2, Christopher L Wolfgang2, Jin He4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is performed to treat tumors of the pancreatic body and tail. Traditionally, splenectomy is performed with a DP, however, laparoscopic spleen-preserving DP (SPDP) using Warshaw's (splenic vessels ligation) or Kimura's (splenic vessels preservation) techniques have been reported. The clinical benefits of using either technique remain unclear. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Warshaw's and Kimura SPDP. This is the first study to evaluate the geographical variation in outcomes of Warshaw's and Kimura SPDP.
METHODS: Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were used to identify studies reporting Warshaw's and Kimura SPDP. Clinical outcomes were compared. Pooled odds risk and weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval were calculated using random effect models.
RESULTS: Fourteen non-randomized controlled studies involving 945 patients met our selection criteria. 301 (31.9%) patients underwent Warshaw's SPDP; 644 (68.1%) underwent Kimura SPDP. Compared to Warshaw's SPDP, patients undergoing Kimura SPDP had a lower incidence of post-operative complications including spleen infarction (OR = 9.64, 95% CI = 5.79 to 16.05, P < 0.001) and gastric varices (OR = 11.88, 95% CI = 5.11 to 27.66, P < 0.001). The length of surgery was significantly shorter for Warshaw's SPDP (WMD = -18.12, 95%CI = -26.52 to -9.72, p < 0.001). Decreased blood loss was reported for patients undergoing Warshaw's SPDP (WMD = -59.72, 95%CI = -102.01 to -17.43, p = 0.006). There were no differences between the two groups' rates of conversion to an open procedure (P = 0.35), postoperative pancreatic fistula (P = 0.71), need for reoperation (P = 0.25), and length of hospital stay (P = 0.38).
CONCLUSION: Both Warshaw's and Kimura are safe SPDP techniques. These data suggest Kimura SPDP is the preferred technique due to less risk of splenic infarct and gastric varices. Despite evidence of regional variation in volume performed (between Kimura and Warshaw's), there are no statistically significant differences in outcomes between these techniques.
Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Distal pancreatectomy; Kimura technique; Laparoscopic; Postoperative outcomes; Warshaw technique

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735894     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of splenic artery variants based on cadaveric studies.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Maria Piagkou; Marios Loukas; John Tsiaoussis; Spiridon G Delis; Ioannis Antonopoulos; Dimitrios Chytas; Konstantinos Natsis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Revisiting the potential advantage of robotic surgical system in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy over conventional laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Seok Jeong Yang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

3.  A new manoeuvre of vascular control in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Retrospective review for a modified Kimura's method.

Authors:  Zhu Jie; Li Hong; Zhang Bin; Wang Haibiao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

4.  Splenic vessel patency: is it real menace to perform laparoscopic splenic vessel-preserving distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dae Joon Park; In Woong Han; Sang Hyup Han; Sun Jong Han; Young Hun You; Young Ju Rhu; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY WITH OR WITHOUT SPLEEN PRESERVATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT AND LONG-TERM OUTCOMES.

Authors:  Sergio Renato Pais-Costa; Guilherme Costa Crispim de Sousa; Sergio Luiz Melo Araujo; Olímpia Alves Teixeira Lima; Sandro José Martins; Orlando J Torres
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2019-12-09

6.  Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open spleen-saving distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Madeline Chee; Chuan-Yaw Lee; Ser-Yee Lee; London L P J Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.