Lars J Kjerpeseth1, Hanne Ellekjær2,3, Randi Selmer4, Inger Ariansen4, Kari Furu4, Eva Skovlund5,4. 1. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. lars.j.kjerpeseth@ntnu.no. 2. Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. 3. Stroke Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 4. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 5. Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Since 2011, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. We wanted to investigate changes in utilization of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in Norway following the introduction of DOACs. METHODS: Using nationwide registries, we identified all adults with pharmacy dispensings for warfarin or DOACs between January 2010 and December 2015 in Norway, and used ambulatory reimbursement codes to identify atrial fibrillation as indication. We defined incident use by a 1-year washout period. We describe trends in prevalent and incident use of warfarin and DOACs between 2010 and 2015, as well as patterns of treatment switching for incident users. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine thousand two hundred eighty-five patients filled at least one prescription for an oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation; the yearly number of incident users increased from 262 to 421 per 100,000 person-years; and the yearly share of incident users who initiated a DOAC increased to 82%. Half the prevalent users were on a DOAC by 2015. Within a year of drug initiation, 6, 12, 16 and 20% of incident users of apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin and dabigatran, respectively, switched oral anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DOACs for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation became more prevalent between 2010 and 2015 in Norway, at the expense of warfarin.
PURPOSE: Since 2011, several direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. We wanted to investigate changes in utilization of oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation in Norway following the introduction of DOACs. METHODS: Using nationwide registries, we identified all adults with pharmacy dispensings for warfarin or DOACs between January 2010 and December 2015 in Norway, and used ambulatory reimbursement codes to identify atrial fibrillation as indication. We defined incident use by a 1-year washout period. We describe trends in prevalent and incident use of warfarin and DOACs between 2010 and 2015, as well as patterns of treatment switching for incident users. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine thousand two hundred eighty-five patients filled at least one prescription for an oral anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation; the yearly number of incident users increased from 262 to 421 per 100,000 person-years; and the yearly share of incident users who initiated a DOAC increased to 82%. Half the prevalent users were on a DOAC by 2015. Within a year of drug initiation, 6, 12, 16 and 20% of incident users of apixaban, rivaroxaban, warfarin and dabigatran, respectively, switched oral anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: Use of DOACs for anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation became more prevalent between 2010 and 2015 in Norway, at the expense of warfarin.
Entities:
Keywords:
Apixaban; Atrial fibrillation; Dabigatran; Drug utilization; Rivaroxaban; Warfarin
Authors: A John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Raffaele De Caterina; Irene Savelieva; Dan Atar; Stefan H Hohnloser; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof Journal: Europace Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Samir B Pancholy; Parikshit S Sharma; Dipti S Pancholy; Tejas M Patel; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Lars Wallentin; Renato D Lopes; Michael Hanna; Laine Thomas; Anne Hellkamp; Sunil Nepal; Elaine M Hylek; Sana M Al-Khatib; John H Alexander; Marco Alings; John Amerena; Jack Ansell; Philip Aylward; Jozef Bartunek; Patrick Commerford; Raffaele De Caterina; Cetin Erol; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Claes Held; John D Horowitz; Kurt Huber; Steen Husted; Matyas Keltai; Fernando Lanas; Liu Lisheng; John J V McMurray; Byung-Hee Oh; Mårten Rosenqvist; Witold Ruzyllo; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Dragos Vinereanu; Denis Xavier; Christopher B Granger Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel E Singer; Anne S Hellkamp; Jonathan P Piccini; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Guohua Pan; Jonathan L Halperin; Richard C Becker; Günter Breithardt; Graeme J Hankey; Werner Hacke; Christopher C Nessel; Manesh R Patel; Robert M Califf; Keith A A Fox Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Marie Bradley; Emily C Welch; Efe Eworuke; David J Graham; Rongmei Zhang; Ting-Ying Huang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 5.128