Literature DB >> 28734874

Robotic assistants in personal care: A scoping review.

A Bilyea1, N Seth2, S Nesathurai3, H A Abdullah4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present an overview of the technological advances in the field of robotics developed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), and to present areas where further research is required. Four databases were searched for articles presenting either a novel design of one of these personal care robotic system or trial results relating to these systems. Articles presenting nine different robotic personal care systems were examined, six of which had been developed after 2005. These six also all have publications relating to their trials. In the majority of trials, patient independence was improved with operation of the robotic device for a specific subset of ADL. A map of the current state of the field of personal care robotics is presented in this study. Areas requiring further research include improving feedback and awareness, as well as refining control methods and pre-programmed behaviors. Developing an affordable, easy to use system would help fill the current gap in the commercial market.
Copyright © 2017 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activities of daily living; Domestic service robotics; Patient independence; Personal care; Review; Upper limb impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734874     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments.

Authors:  Justyna Gerłowska; Urszula Skrobas; Katarzyna Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz; Agnieszka Korchut; Sebastian Szklener; Dorota Szczęśniak-Stańczyk; Dimitrios Tzovaras; Konrad Rejdak
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  A system for bedside assistance that integrates a robotic bed and a mobile manipulator.

Authors:  Ariel S Kapusta; Phillip M Grice; Henry M Clever; Yash Chitalia; Daehyung Park; Charles C Kemp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Attitudes of Therapists and Physicians on the Use of Sex Robots in Sexual Therapy: Online Survey and Interview Study.

Authors:  Lisa Hübner; Christiane Eichenberg; Marwa Khamis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats.

Authors:  Amara Callistus Nwosu; Bethany Sturgeon; Tamsin McGlinchey; Christian Dg Goodwin; Ardhendu Behera; Stephen Mason; Sarah Stanley; Terry R Payne
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  A Low-Cost Assistive Robot for Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders to Aid in Daily Living Activities.

Authors:  Roberto J López-Sastre; Marcos Baptista-Ríos; Francisco Javier Acevedo-Rodríguez; Soraya Pacheco-da-Costa; Saturnino Maldonado-Bascón; Sergio Lafuente-Arroyo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Endowing a NAO Robot With Practical Social-Touch Perception.

Authors:  Rachael Bevill Burns; Hyosang Lee; Hasti Seifi; Robert Faulkner; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-04-19

7.  Controlling an effector with eye movements: The effect of entangled sensory and motor responsibilities.

Authors:  John R Schultz; Andrew B Slifkin; Eric M Schearer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.