Literature DB >> 28734609

Reinforcements in avian wing bones: Experiments, analysis, and modeling.

E Novitskaya1, C J Ruestes2, M M Porter3, V A Lubarda4, M A Meyers4, J McKittrick5.   

Abstract

Almost all species of modern birds are capable of flight; the mechanical competency of their wings and the rigidity of their skeletal system evolved to enable this outstanding feat. One of the most interesting examples of structural adaptation in birds is the internal structure of their wing bones. In flying birds, bones need to be sufficiently strong and stiff to withstand forces during takeoff, flight, and landing, with a minimum of weight. The cross-sectional morphology and presence of reinforcing structures (struts and ridges) found within bird wing bones vary from species to species, depending on how the wings are utilized. It is shown that both morphology and internal features increases the resistance to flexure and torsion with a minimum weight penalty. Prototypes of reinforcing struts fabricated by 3D printing were tested in diametral compression and torsion to validate the concept. In compression, the ovalization decreased through the insertion of struts, while they had no effect on torsional resistance. An elastic model of a circular ring reinforced by horizontal and vertical struts is developed to explain the compressive stiffening response of the ring caused by differently oriented struts.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Mechanical properties; Micro-computed tomography; Strut; Vulture bone

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734609     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  2 in total

1.  Deciphering an extreme morphology: bone microarchitecture of the hero shrew backbone (Soricidae: Scutisorex).

Authors:  Stephanie M Smith; Kenneth D Angielczyk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Does bone preparation impact its shape: consequences for comparative analyses of bone shape.

Authors:  Fanny Pagès; Anne-Claire Fabre; Anick Abourachid
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.