Literature DB >> 28734593

Unifying Research on Social-Ecological Resilience and Collapse.

Graeme S Cumming1, Garry D Peterson2.   

Abstract

Ecosystems influence human societies, leading people to manage ecosystems for human benefit. Poor environmental management can lead to reduced ecological resilience and social-ecological collapse. We review research on resilience and collapse across different systems and propose a unifying social-ecological framework based on (i) a clear definition of system identity; (ii) the use of quantitative thresholds to define collapse; (iii) relating collapse processes to system structure; and (iv) explicit comparison of alternative hypotheses and models of collapse. Analysis of 17 representative cases identified 14 mechanisms, in five classes, that explain social-ecological collapse. System structure influences the kind of collapse a system may experience. Mechanistic theories of collapse that unite structure and process can make fundamental contributions to solving global environmental problems.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive cycle; feedback; heterarchy; social–ecological system; threshold; vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734593     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  10 in total

1.  Linking economic growth pathways and environmental sustainability by understanding development as alternate social-ecological regimes.

Authors:  Graeme S Cumming; Stephan von Cramon-Taubadel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  History meets palaeoscience: Consilience and collaboration in studying past societal responses to environmental change.

Authors:  John Haldon; Lee Mordechai; Timothy P Newfield; Arlen F Chase; Adam Izdebski; Piotr Guzowski; Inga Labuhn; Neil Roberts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Climate change, ecosystems and abrupt change: science priorities.

Authors:  Monica G Turner; W John Calder; Graeme S Cumming; Terry P Hughes; Anke Jentsch; Shannon L LaDeau; Timothy M Lenton; Bryan N Shuman; Merritt R Turetsky; Zak Ratajczak; John W Williams; A Park Williams; Stephen R Carpenter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Agricultural land use and the sustainability of social-ecological systems.

Authors:  Diego Bengochea Paz; Kirsten Henderson; Michel Loreau
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Lessons from the past, policies for the future: resilience and sustainability in past crises.

Authors:  John Haldon; Merle Eisenberg; Lee Mordechai; Adam Izdebski; Sam White
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2020-05-24

Review 6.  The application of resilience theory in urban development: a literature review.

Authors:  Li Kong; Xianzhong Mu; Guangwen Hu; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  The persistence of ancient settlements and urban sustainability.

Authors:  Michael E Smith; José Lobo; Matthew A Peeples; Abigail M York; Benjamin W Stanley; Katherine A Crawford; Nicolas Gauthier; Angela C Huster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ecology of the collapse of Rapa Nui society.

Authors:  M Lima; E M Gayo; C Latorre; C M Santoro; S A Estay; N Cañellas-Boltà; O Margalef; S Giralt; A Sáez; S Pla-Rabes; N Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The genetic and cultural evolution of unsustainability.

Authors:  Brian F Snyder
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.367

10.  Housing market bubbles and urban resilience: Applying systems theory.

Authors:  Bilal Ayub; Nader Naderpajouh; Frank Boukamp; Tony McGough
Journal:  Cities       Date:  2020-09-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.