Literature DB >> 28734592

Publishing with Objective Charisma: Breaking Science's Paradox.

Zoë A Doubleday1, Sean D Connell2.   

Abstract

Good writing takes time, but in a research environment where speed is master, is it a superfluous pursuit? Scientists spend most of their working life writing, yet our writing style obstructs its key purpose: communication. We advocate more accessible prose that boosts the influence of our publications. For those who change, the proof of their success will be science that is read, understood, and remembered.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  accessibility; objectivity; scientific writing; sensationalism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28734592     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  3 in total

1.  Opinion: How can we boost the impact of publications? Try better writing.

Authors:  Benjamin Freeling; Zoë A Doubleday; Sean D Connell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Poetry as a Creative Practice to Enhance Engagement and Learning in Conservation Science.

Authors:  Stephanie R Januchowski-Hartley; Natalie Sopinka; Bethann G Merkle; Christina Lux; Anna Zivian; Patrick Goff; Samantha Oester
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 8.589

3.  The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature.

Authors:  Adrian Barnett; Zoe Doubleday
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.