Literature DB >> 28733784

Environmental impact of coal mining and coal seam gas production on surface water quality in the Sydney basin, Australia.

A Ali1, V Strezov2, P Davies2, I Wright3.   

Abstract

The extraction of coal and coal seam gas (CSG) will generate produced water that, if not adequately treated, will pollute surface and groundwater systems. In Australia, the discharge of produced water from coal mining and related activities is regulated by the state environment agency through a pollution licence. This licence sets the discharge limits for a range of analytes to protect the environment into which the produced water is discharged. This study reports on the impact of produced water from coal mine activities located within or discharging into high conservation environments, such as National Parks, in the outer region of Sydney, Australia. The water samples upstream and downstream from the discharge points from six mines were taken, and 110 parameters were tested. The results were assessed against a water quality index (WQI) which accounts for pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, total dissolved solids, total phosphorus, nitrate nitrogen and E .coli. The water quality assessment based on the trace metal contents against various national maximum admissible concentration (MAC) and their corresponding environmental impacts was also included in the study which also established a base value of water quality for further study. The study revealed that impacted water downstream of the mine discharge points contained higher metal content than the upstream reference locations. In many cases, the downstream water was above the Australia and New Zealand Environment Conservation Council and international water quality guidelines for freshwater stream. The major outliers to the guidelines were aluminium (Al), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni) and zinc (Zn). The WQI of surface water at and downstream of the discharge point was lower when compared to upstream or reference conditions in the majority of cases. Toxicology indices of metals present in industrial discharges were used as an additional tool to assess water quality, and the newly proposed environmental water quality index (EWQI) lead to better trend in the impact of coal and coal seam gas mining activities on surface water quality when compared to the upstream reference water samples. Metal content limits were based on the impact points assigned by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, USA. For environmental and health impact assessment, the approach used in this study can be applied as a model to provide a basis to assess the anthropogenic contribution from the industrial and mining activities on the environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal mine; Coal seam gas; Environmental impact; Surface water; Water quality index

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733784     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-6110-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  21 in total

1.  An innovative index for evaluating water quality in streams.

Authors:  Ahmend Said; David K Stevens; Gerald Sehlke
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Evaluation of water quality in the Chillán River (Central Chile) using physicochemical parameters and a modified water quality index.

Authors:  Patrick Debels; Ricardo Figueroa; Roberto Urrutia; Ricardo Barra; Xavier Niell
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Development of a new approach to cumulative effects assessment: a northern river ecosystem example.

Authors:  Monique Dubé; Brian Johnson; Gary Dunn; Joseph Culp; Kevin Cash; Kelly Munkittrick; Isaac Wong; Kathlene Hedley; William Booty; David Lam; Oskar Resler; Alex Storey
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Evaluation of natural and anthropogenic influences on the Guadalquivir River (Spain) by dissolved heavy metals and nutrients.

Authors:  Carolina Mendiguchía; Carlos Moreno; Manuel García-Vargas
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Assessment of heavy metal pollution in water using multivariate statistical techniques in an industrial area: a case study from Patancheru, Medak District, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Aradhi K Krishna; M Satyanarayanan; Pradip K Govil
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 10.588

6.  Heavy metals in rivers of Latvia.

Authors:  M Kļaviņs; A Briede; V Rodinov; I Kokorite; E Parele; I Kļaviņa
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Bioavailability and plant accumulation of heavy metals and phosphorus in agricultural soils amended by long-term application of sewage sludge.

Authors:  P S Kidd; M J Domínguez-Rodríguez; J Díez; C Monterroso
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Health deficiencies in Cape Breton County, Nova Scotia, Canada, 1950-1995.

Authors:  P J Veugelers; J R Guernsey
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Application of CCME Water Quality Index to monitor water quality: a case study of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada.

Authors:  Ashok Lumb; Doug Halliwell; Tribeni Sharma
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Utilization of the water quality index method as a classification tool.

Authors:  Hülya Boyacioglu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.513

View more
  3 in total

1.  Manganese Stress Adaptation Mechanisms of Bacillus safensis Strain ST7 From Mine Soil.

Authors:  Xueqin Ran; Zhongmei Zhu; Hong Long; Qun Tian; Longjiang You; Xingdiao Wu; Qin Liu; Shihui Huang; Sheng Li; Xi Niu; Jiafu Wang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Water quality assessment of Australian ports using water quality evaluation indices.

Authors:  Sayka Jahan; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessment of Impacts of Coal Mining in the Region of Sydney, Australia on the Aquatic Environment Using Macroinvertebrates and Chlorophyll as Indicators.

Authors:  Aal-E Ali; Daniel R Sloane; Vladimir Strezov
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.