Literature DB >> 28733072

Early myocardial edema after acute myocardial infarction is stable and not bimodal in humans - Evidence from a large CMR multicenter study.

Thomas Stiermaier1, Holger Thiele1, Ingo Eitel2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental data reported a temporal pattern of myocardial edema following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the time course of myocardial edema in a large population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: Myocardium at risk (MAR), infarct size (IS) and myocardial salvage index (MSI) were compared according to the time between infarction and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a large multicenter STEMI cohort (n=795). CMR scans performed >8days (>192h) after AMI were excluded (n=23). Scans performed within 8days were reported at time-points 12-24h, 24-36h, 36-48h, and days 3 to 8 (192h).
RESULTS: MAR/MSI and IS could be assessed in 693 and 755 patients, respectively. The extent of MAR over the first week after ischemia/reperfusion showed a slight rise and fall (p=0.029 in one-way analysis of variance). However, analysis of IS demonstrated a similar trend over time (p=0.026). Post-hoc testing did not reveal significant differences between particular time periods for both MAR and IS. A stable edematous reaction was also observed between 12-24h, 24-36h, 36-48h and up to 8days after infarction in a more detailed analysis. MSI did not show statistically significant variations (p=0.147). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify the time of CMR acquisition as a predictor of MAR (p=0.709), IS (p=0.810) or MSI (p=0.916).
CONCLUSION: These data do not confirm a temporal pattern of myocardial edema over the first week after AMI in humans.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Myocardial edema; Myocardial infarction; T2-weighted imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733072     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac MRI Endpoints in Myocardial Infarction Experimental and Clinical Trials: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Borja Ibanez; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai; Hakan Arheden; Jeroen Bax; Colin Berry; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Pierre Croisille; Erica Dall'Armellina; Rohan Dharmakumar; Ingo Eitel; Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Matthias G Friedrich; David García-Dorado; Derek J Hausenloy; Raymond J Kim; Sebastian Kozerke; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Javier Sánchez-González; Javier Sanz; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Cardiac Graft Assessment in the Era of Machine Perfusion: Current and Future Biomarkers.

Authors:  Martina Bona; Rahel K Wyss; Maria Arnold; Natalia Méndez-Carmona; Maria N Sanz; Dominik Günsch; Lucio Barile; Thierry P Carrel; Sarah L Longnus
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Acute-Phase Inflammatory Reaction Predicts CMR Myocardial Scar Pattern and 2-Year Mortality in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary PCI.

Authors:  Andras Mester; Nora Rat; Theodora Benedek; Diana Opincariu; Roxana Hodas; Monica Chitu; Imre Benedek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Left Ventricular Mechanical Uniformity Alterations for Risk Assessment After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Thomas Stiermaier; Sören J Backhaus; Torben Lange; Alexander Koschalka; Jenny-Lou Navarra; Patricia Boom; Pablo Lamata; Johannes T Kowallick; Joachim Lotz; Matthias Gutberlet; Suzanne de Waha-Thiele; Steffen Desch; Gerd Hasenfuß; Holger Thiele; Ingo Eitel; Andreas Schuster
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.