Literature DB >> 28731954

Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single Team Preliminary Experience.

Xiaohui Duan1, Bo Jiang, Lixue Zhou, Jianhui Yang, Bingzhang Tian, Huiming Wen, Xianhai Mao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to describe the authors' experience and the perioperative outcome for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Perioperative clinical data of 57 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) procedures performed from January 2014 to May 2016 in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The median of operative time was 315 minutes (range, 220 to 575 min) and the median of intraoperative estimated blood loss was 200 mL (range, 100 to 550 mL). Conversion to open PD was required in 3 patients (5.3%) as a result of difficult dissection. Hand-assisted LPD was used in 2 patients (3.5%). Mean length of hospital stay was 14.8 days (8 to 29 d). Cumulative surgery-related morbidity was 28.1%, included bleeding (n=4), pancreatic fistula (n=3), biliary fistula (n=1), delayed gastric emptying (n=1), intra-abdominal infection (n=3), pulmonary infection (n=3), and ileus (n=1). Postoperative severe complications (Clavien≥III) were detected in 4 patients (7.0%) including 1 intra-abdominal infection, 2 postoperative bleeding event, and 1 afferent delayed gastric emptying. Three patients required reoperation. There was no 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Pathologic diagnoses were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n=5), ampullary adenocarcinoma (n=10), duodenal adenocarcinoma (n=24), distal common bile duct cancer (n=13), atypical hyperplasia of bile duct (n=2), and chronic pancreatitis (n=3). No patient had margin positive resection; the number of harvested lymph nodes were (16.7±4.2), the number of positive lymph nodes were (1.3±1.1).
CONCLUSIONS: LPD, although complicated and difficult, serve as a safe and effective method for experienced surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28731954     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  5 in total

1.  The Yonsei experience of 104 laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies: a propensity score-matched analysis with open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sang Hyup Han; Chang Moo Kang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Dong Sup Yoon; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage increases postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared to endoscopic nasobiliary drainage.

Authors:  Sang Hyup Han; Joo Seop Kim; Ji Woong Hwang; Hae Sung Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05

3.  Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in Vietnamese patients with periampullary of Vater malignancies: A single-institution prospective study.

Authors:  Tran Que Son; Tran Hieu Hoc; Nguyen Tien Quyet; Tran Bình Giang; Nguyen Ngoc Hung; Tran Thanh Tung; Tran Thu Huong
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-08-27

4.  Study on the Risk Factors of Pulmonary Infection after Laparoscopic Surgery and Analysis of the Detection Results of Drug-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Tingting Zhai; Liwei Zhang; Jing Sun; Yuanchun Li; Jie Hou; Fengxia Du
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Outcome of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy during initial learning curve versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Jiangjiao Zhou; Li Xiong; Xiongying Miao; Juan Liu; Heng Zou; Yu Wen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.