BACKGROUND: In the UK, general practitioners/family physicians receive pay for performance on management of long-term conditions, according to best-practice indicators. METHOD: Management of long-term conditions was compared between 721 adults with intellectual disabilities and the general population (n = 764,672). Prevalence of long-term conditions was determined, and associated factors were investigated via logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Adults with intellectual disabilities received significantly poorer management of all long-term conditions on 38/57 (66.7%) indicators. Achievement was high (75.1%-100%) for only 19.6% of adults with intellectual disabilities, compared with 76.8% of the general population. Adults with intellectual disabilities had higher rates of epilepsy, psychosis, hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes and heart failure. There were no clear associations with neighbourhood deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with intellectual disabilities receive poorer care, despite conditions being more prevalent. The imperative now is to find practical, implementable means of supporting the challenges that general practices face in delivering equitable care.
BACKGROUND: In the UK, general practitioners/family physicians receive pay for performance on management of long-term conditions, according to best-practice indicators. METHOD: Management of long-term conditions was compared between 721 adults with intellectual disabilities and the general population (n = 764,672). Prevalence of long-term conditions was determined, and associated factors were investigated via logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Adults with intellectual disabilities received significantly poorer management of all long-term conditions on 38/57 (66.7%) indicators. Achievement was high (75.1%-100%) for only 19.6% of adults with intellectual disabilities, compared with 76.8% of the general population. Adults with intellectual disabilities had higher rates of epilepsy, psychosis, hypothyroidism, asthma, diabetes and heart failure. There were no clear associations with neighbourhood deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Adults with intellectual disabilities receive poorer care, despite conditions being more prevalent. The imperative now is to find practical, implementable means of supporting the challenges that general practices face in delivering equitable care.
Authors: Alissa C Cyrus; Julie Royer; Dianna D Carroll; Elizabeth A Courtney-Long; Suzanne McDermott; Margaret A Turk Journal: Am J Intellect Dev Disabil Date: 2019-05
Authors: Sally-Ann Cooper; Angela Henderson; Deborah Kinnear; Daniel Mackay; Michael Fleming; Gillian S Smith; Laura Anne Hughes-McCormack; Ewelina Rydzewska; Kirsty Dunn; J P Pell; Craig Melville Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Milou van den Bemd; Maarten Cuypers; Erik W M A Bischoff; Marloes Heutmekers; Bianca Schalk; Geraline L Leusink Journal: J Appl Res Intellect Disabil Date: 2021-11-08
Authors: Natalie A Strobel; Jenny Bourke; Helen Leonard; Alice Richardson; Karen M Edmond; Daniel McAullay Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Laura García-Domínguez; Patricia Navas; Miguel Ángel Verdugo; Víctor B Arias Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 3.390