Literature DB >> 28730651

A comparison of the electrophysiologic and electroanatomic characteristics between the right and left atrium in persistent atrial fibrillation: Is the right atrium a window into the left?

Sandeep Prabhu1,2,3,4, Aleksandr Voskoboinik1,2,3,4, Alex J A McLellan1,2,3,4, Kah Y Peck1, Bhupesh Pathik3,4, Chrishan J Nalliah3,4, Geoff R Wong3,4, Sonia M Azzopardi1,2, Geoffrey Lee3, Justin Mariani1,2, Liang-Han Ling1,2,3,4, Andrew J Taylor1,2, Jonathan M Kalman3,4, Peter M Kistler1,2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The right atrium (RA) is readily accessible; however, it is unclear whether changes in the RA are representative of the LA. We performed detailed biatrial electroanatomic mapping to determine the electrophysiological relationship between the atria. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent biatrial electroanatomical mapping with a contact force catheter acquiring points with a CF >10 g prior to ablation. Points were analyzed for tissue voltage, complex electrograms, low voltage (<0.5 mV), scar (<0.05 mV), and conduction velocity (CV). Forty patients (mean age 59 ± 9.2 years, AF duration 12.9 ± 9.2 months, LA area: 28 ± 5.2, RA area: 25 ± 6.4 mm2 , LVEF: 44 ± 15%) underwent mapping during CS pacing. Bipolar voltage (R = 0.57, P <0.001), unipolar voltage (R = 0.68, P <0.001), low voltage (<0.5 nV) (R = 0.48, P = 0.002), fractionation (R = 0.73, P <0.001), and CV (R = 0.49, P = 0.001) correlated well between atria. There was no difference in global bipolar voltage (LA 1.89 ± 0.77 vs. RA 1.77 ± 0.57 mV, P = 0.57); complex electrograms (LA 20% vs. RA 20%, P = 0.99) or low voltage (LA 15% vs. RA 16%, P = 0.84). Global unipolar voltage was significantly higher in the LA compared to the RA (2.95 ± 1.14 vs. 2.28 ± 0.65 mV, P = 0.002) and CV was significantly slower in the RA compared to the LA (0.93 ± 0.15 m/s vs. 1.01 ± 0.19 m/s, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: AF is associated with remodeling processes affecting both atria. The more accessible RA provides an insight into the biatrial process associated with AF in various disease states without trans-septal access.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; biatrial; remodelling; substrate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730651     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Relevance of Sinus Rhythm Mapping to Quantify Electropathology Related to Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Mathijs S van Schie; Natasja Ms de Groot
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2022-04

2.  The Value of Voltage Histogram Analysis Derived Right Atrial Scar Burden in the Prediction of Left Atrial Scar Burden.

Authors:  Szilvia Herczeg; Joseph Galvin; John J Keaney; Edward Keelan; Roger Byrne; Claire Howard; Laszlo Geller; Gabor Szeplaki
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 1.866

3.  Sinus rhythm voltage fingerprinting in patients with mitral valve disease using a high-density epicardial mapping approach.

Authors:  Mathijs S van Schie; Roeliene Starreveld; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 4.  Clinical utility of left atrial strain in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: An up-to-date review.

Authors:  Zhi-Xi Yu; Wen Yang; Wei-Si Yin; Ke-Xin Peng; Yi-Lin Pan; Wei-Wei Chen; Bei-Bei Du; Yu-Quan He; Ping Yang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Impact of right atrial structural remodeling on recurrence after ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Takahito Takagi; Keijiro Nakamura; Masako Asami; Yasutake Toyoda; Yoshinari Enomoto; Masao Moroi; Mahito Noro; Kaoru Sugi; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-05-06

6.  Optimising Large Animal Models of Sustained Atrial Fibrillation: Relevance of the Critical Mass Hypothesis.

Authors:  Nathan C Denham; Charles M Pearman; George W P Madders; Charlotte E R Smith; Andrew W Trafford; Katharine M Dibb
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.