Literature DB >> 28730619

Real-World Adherence and Persistence with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Adults with Atrial Fibrillation.

Beenish S Manzoor1, Todd A Lee1,2, Lisa K Sharp1,2, Surrey M Walton1,2, William L Galanter1,3, Edith A Nutescu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence of adherence and persistence patterns in anticoagulation (AC) therapy comparing treatment-naïve and non-naïve patients is lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate patterns of medication adherence and persistence in a real-world setting among AC-naïve and AC-experienced patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
METHODS: AF patients newly initiating a DOAC with a minimum of 6 months of continuous health plan enrollment pre and postindex date (first DOAC prescription) were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2009-2013). DOAC adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]), persistence, and predictors of adherence were assessed at 6 and 12 months postindex.
RESULTS: Of 66,090 AF patients included, 46.6% (n=30,826) were AC naïve and 53.4% (n=35,264) were AC experienced (age: 66.9 ± 12.7 vs 70.4 ± 11.4 yrs, p<0.001; male: n=19,132 [62.1%] vs n=21,691 [61.5%], p=0.14, respectively). A majority of patients received dabigatran as their index DOAC (n=49,210; 74.5%). The mean PDC in AC-naïve versus AC-experienced patients at 6 and 12 months of follow-up was 72.3% versus 83.3% (p<0.001) and 63.7% versus 79.9% (p<0.001), respectively. Persistence with DOAC therapy in AC-naïve and AC-experienced patients at 6 and 12 months ranged from 59.3% and 76.3% (p<0.0001) to 31.6% and 50.2% (p<0.0001), respectively. Predictors of higher DOAC adherence were older age and higher number of concomitant medications. Predictors of lower adherence were higher number of comorbidities and AC-naïve user status.
CONCLUSION: Medication adherence and persistence with DOACs declined over time and both were suboptimal and lower (at 6 and 12 mo postindex) in AC-naïve compared to AC-experienced patients. These findings can help target future strategies or interventions for patient education and long-term AC management especially in those patients naïve to DOAC therapy. Future investigation should examine potential reasons for differences in DOAC adherence and persistence between AC-experienced versus AC-naïve patients and the implications for patient outcomes.
© 2017 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adherence; apixaban; atrial fibrillation; dabigatran; direct oral anticoagulants; persistence; rivaroxaban

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28730619     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  24 in total

Review 1.  Role of the anticoagulant monitoring service in 2018: beyond warfarin.

Authors:  Nathan P Clark
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Oral anticoagulant use and clinical outcomes in elderly Japanese patients: findings from the SAKURA AF Registry.

Authors:  Toshihiko Nishida; Yasuo Okumura; Katsuaki Yokoyama; Naoya Matsumoto; Eizo Tachibana; Keiichiro Kuronuma; Koji Oiwa; Michiaki Matsumoto; Toshiaki Kojima; Shoji Hanada; Kazumiki Nomoto; Kazumasa Sonoda; Ken Arima; Rikitake Kogawa; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Tomobumi Kotani; Kimie Ohkubo; Seiji Fukushima; Satoru Itou; Kunio Kondo; Masaaki Chiku; Yasumi Ohno; Motoyuki Onikura; Atsushi Hirayama
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world.

Authors:  Madan Raj Aryal; Rohit Gosain; Anthony Donato; Han Yu; Anjan Katel; Yashoda Bhandari; Rashmi Dhital; Peter A Kouides
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-08-13

4.  Low persistence to rivaroxaban or warfarin among patients with new venous thromboembolism at a safety net academic medical center.

Authors:  Sweta Meet Patel; Tina Wang; Desire Lashalle Outler; Jennifer Elliott; Michael Knauss; Samuel K Peasah; Mikhail Akbashev
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Risk of hospitalised bleeding in comparisons of oral anticoagulant options for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Pamela L Lutsey; Neil A Zakai; Richard F MacLehose; Faye L Norby; Rob F Walker; Nicholas S Roetker; Terrence J Adam; Alvaro Alonso
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 6.  Methodological considerations for investigating oral anticoagulation persistence in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Miney Paquette; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Alfonso Iorio; Robby Nieuwlaat
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother       Date:  2021-05-23

7.  Factors Associated with Anticoagulation Adherence in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ting Song; Xiao Xin; Peirong Cui; Mingcan Zong; Xianhua Li
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Association between medication adherence and illness perceptions in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: An observational cross-sectional pilot study.

Authors:  Motoyasu Miyazaki; Akio Nakashima; Yoshihiko Nakamura; Yuya Sakamoto; Koichi Matsuo; Miwa Goto; Masanobu Uchiyama; Keisuke Okamura; Ryoko Mitsutake; Hidenori Urata; Hidetoshi Kamimura; Osamu Imakyure
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patient Education on Oral Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Emily M Hawes
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-20

10.  The Role of Adherence Thresholds for Development and Performance Aspects of a Prediction Model for Direct Oral Anticoagulation Adherence.

Authors:  Carmen Ruff; Ludmila Koukalova; Walter E Haefeli; Andreas D Meid
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.