Cathal Ryan1, Michael Bergin2, John Sg Wells3. 1. Department of Nursing and Health Care, School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland. cryan@wit.ie. 2. Department of Nursing and Health Care, School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland. 3. School of Health Sciences, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature as this relates to theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions, drawing upon empirical evidence from the fields of psychology, business, information technology and health care. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature utilising principles outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken. RESULTS: Several relevant theoretical perspectives have emerged, eight of which are charted and discussed in this review. These are the Internet Intervention Model, Persuasive Systems Design, the 'PERMA' framework, the Support Accountability Model, the Model of User Engagement, the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of IT and the Conceptual Model of User Engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the review indicate that an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of technological, environmental and individual factors, may be needed in order to comprehensively explain user adherence to web-based interventions.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to review the literature as this relates to theoretical perspectives of adherence to web-based interventions, drawing upon empirical evidence from the fields of psychology, business, information technology and health care. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature utilising principles outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken. RESULTS: Several relevant theoretical perspectives have emerged, eight of which are charted and discussed in this review. These are the Internet Intervention Model, Persuasive Systems Design, the 'PERMA' framework, the Support Accountability Model, the Model of User Engagement, the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of IT and the Conceptual Model of User Engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the review indicate that an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating a range of technological, environmental and individual factors, may be needed in order to comprehensively explain user adherence to web-based interventions.
Authors: Andrew Prestwich; Falko F Sniehotta; Craig Whittington; Stephan U Dombrowski; Lizzie Rogers; Susan Michie Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Geke D S Ludden; Thomas J L van Rompay; Saskia M Kelders; Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Laura Dennison; Leanne Morrison; Scott Lloyd; Dawn Phillips; Beth Stuart; Sarah Williams; Katherine Bradbury; Paul Roderick; Elizabeth Murray; Susan Michie; Paul Little; Lucy Yardley Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Christopher Sundström; Mikael Gajecki; Magnus Johansson; Matthijs Blankers; Kristina Sinadinovic; Erik Stenlund-Gens; Anne H Berman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Marie-Therése Crafoord; Maria Fjell; Kay Sundberg; Marie Nilsson; Ann Langius-Eklöf Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Pao-Hwa Lin; Steven Grambow; Stephen Intille; John A Gallis; Tony Lazenka; Hayden Bosworth; Corrine L Voils; Gary G Bennett; Bryan Batch; Jenifer Allen; Leonor Corsino; Crystal Tyson; Laura Svetkey Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 4.773