Noam Schneck1,2,3, Stefan Haufe3,4, Tao Tu3, George A Bonanno5, Kevin Ochsner6, Paul Sajda3, J John Mann1,2. 1. Division of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY. 4. Machine Learning Group, Institute of Software Engineering and Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin. 5. Department of Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. 6. Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deceased-related thinking is central to grieving and potentially critical to processing of the loss. Self-report measurements might fail to capture important elements of deceased-related thinking and processing. Here, we used a machine learning approach applied to fMRI - known as neural decoding - to develop a measure of ongoing deceased-related processing. METHODS: 23 subjects grieving the loss of a first-degree relative, spouse or partner within 14 months underwent two fMRI tasks. They first viewed pictures and stories related to the deceased, a living control and a demographic control figure while providing ongoing valence and arousal ratings. Second, they performed a 10-minute Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) with thought probes every 25-35 seconds to identify deceased, living and self-related thoughts. RESULTS: A conjunction analysis, controlling for valence/arousal, identified neural clusters in basal ganglia, orbital prefrontal cortex and insula associated with both types of deceased-related stimuli vs. the two control conditions in the first task. This pattern was applied to fMRI data collected during the SART, and discriminated deceased-related but not living or self-related thoughts, independently of grief-severity and time since loss. Deceased-related thoughts on the SART correlated with self-reported avoidance. The neural model predicted avoidance over and above deceased-related thoughts. CONCLUSIONS: A neural pattern trained to identify mental representations of the deceased tracked deceased-related thinking during a sustained attention task and also predicted subject-level avoidance. This approach provides a new imaging tool to be used as an index of processing the deceased for future studies of complicated grief.
BACKGROUND: Deceased-related thinking is central to grieving and potentially critical to processing of the loss. Self-report measurements might fail to capture important elements of deceased-related thinking and processing. Here, we used a machine learning approach applied to fMRI - known as neural decoding - to develop a measure of ongoing deceased-related processing. METHODS: 23 subjects grieving the loss of a first-degree relative, spouse or partner within 14 months underwent two fMRI tasks. They first viewed pictures and stories related to the deceased, a living control and a demographic control figure while providing ongoing valence and arousal ratings. Second, they performed a 10-minute Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) with thought probes every 25-35 seconds to identify deceased, living and self-related thoughts. RESULTS: A conjunction analysis, controlling for valence/arousal, identified neural clusters in basal ganglia, orbital prefrontal cortex and insula associated with both types of deceased-related stimuli vs. the two control conditions in the first task. This pattern was applied to fMRI data collected during the SART, and discriminated deceased-related but not living or self-related thoughts, independently of grief-severity and time since loss. Deceased-related thoughts on the SART correlated with self-reported avoidance. The neural model predicted avoidance over and above deceased-related thoughts. CONCLUSIONS: A neural pattern trained to identify mental representations of the deceased tracked deceased-related thinking during a sustained attention task and also predicted subject-level avoidance. This approach provides a new imaging tool to be used as an index of processing the deceased for future studies of complicated grief.
Authors: David Badre; Russell A Poldrack; E Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Rachel Z Insler; Anthony D Wagner Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Margaret Stroebe; Paul A Boelen; Marcel van den Hout; Wolfgang Stroebe; Elske Salemink; Jan van den Bout Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Maarten C Eisma; Mike Rinck; Margaret S Stroebe; Henk A W Schut; Paul A Boelen; Wolfgang Stroebe; Jan van den Bout Journal: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-25
Authors: Mary-Frances O'Connor; David K Wellisch; Annette L Stanton; Naomi I Eisenberger; Michael R Irwin; Matthew D Lieberman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-05-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: S E Kakarala; K E Roberts; M Rogers; T Coats; F Falzarano; J Gang; M Chilov; J Avery; P K Maciejewski; W G Lichtenthal; H G Prigerson Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Noam Schneck; Tao Tu; Stefan Haufe; George A Bonanno; Hanga GalfaIvy; Kevin N Ochsner; J John Mann; Paul Sajda Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 3.436