Literature DB >> 28728921

Web-based questionnaires to assess perinatal outcome proved to be valid.

Marleen M H J van Gelder1, Saskia Vorstenbosch2, Lineke Derks3, Bernke Te Winkel2, Eugène P van Puijenbroek4, Nel Roeleveld5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to validate a Web-based questionnaire completed by the mother to assess perinatal outcome used in a prospective cohort study. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: For 882 women with an estimated date of delivery between February 2012 and February 2015 who participated in the PRegnancy and Infant DEvelopment (PRIDE) Study, we compared data on pregnancy outcome, including mode of delivery, plurality, gestational age, birth weight and length, head circumference, birth defects, and infant sex, from Web-based questionnaires administered to the mothers 2 months after delivery with data from obstetric records. For continuous variables, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), whereas sensitivity and specificity were determined for categorical variables.
RESULTS: We observed only very small differences between the two methods of data collection for gestational age (ICC, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.92), birth weight (ICC, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.95-0.96), birth length (ICC, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.92), and head circumference (ICC, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93). Agreement between the Web-based questionnaire and obstetric records was high as well, with sensitivity ranging between 0.86 (termination of pregnancy) and 1.00 (four outcomes) and specificity between 0.96 (term birth) and 1.00 (nine outcomes).
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that Web-based questionnaires could be considered as a valid complementary or alternative method of data collection.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; Medical records; PRIDE Study; Pregnancy; Questionnaires; Validation studies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728921     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  6 in total

1.  Associations between maternal awakening salivary cortisol levels in mid-pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Richelle Vlenterie; Judith B Prins; Nel Roeleveld; Marleen M H J van Gelder
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Accuracy of self-reported birth outcomes relative to birth certificate data in an Internet-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Tanran R Wang; Amelia K Wesselink; Sydney K Willis; Alina Chaiyasarikul; Jessica S Levinson; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; David A Savitz
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.103

3.  An Inventory of European Birth Cohorts.

Authors:  Claudia Pansieri; Chiara Pandolfini; Antonio Clavenna; Imti Choonara; Maurizio Bonati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Implementation and Effects of Risk-Dependent Obstetric Care in the Netherlands (Expect Study II): Protocol for an Impact Study.

Authors:  Pim van Montfort; Jessica Ppm Willemse; Carmen D Dirksen; Ivo Ma van Dooren; Linda Je Meertens; Marc Ea Spaanderman; Maartje Zelis; Iris M Zwaan; Hubertina Cj Scheepers; Luc Jm Smits
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-05-04

5.  The PRIDE Study: Evaluation of online methods of data collection.

Authors:  Marleen M H J van Gelder; Peter J F M Merkus; Joris van Drongelen; Jessie W Swarts; Tom H van de Belt; Nel Roeleveld
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.980

6.  The Baby Hearts Study - a case-control methodology with data linkage to evaluate risk and protective factors for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  N McCullough; H Dolk; M Loane; B M Lagan; F Casey; B Craig
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-04-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.