Literature DB >> 28728721

Updates in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery for General Surgeons.

Muhammad Habib Zubair1, John Michael Smith2.   

Abstract

Significant improvement and development have occurred in minimally invasive cardiac surgery over the past 20 years. Although most studies have consistently demonstrated equivalent or improved outcomes compared with conventional cardiac surgery, with significantly shorter recovery times, adoption continues to be limited. In addition, cost data have been inconsistent. Further ongoing trials are needed to help determine the exact roles for these innovative procedures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Atrial septal defect; Coronary artery bypass graft; Minimally invasive cardiac surgery; Mitral valve; Robot

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728721     DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Training Efficacy Between Custom-Made Skills Simulator (CMSS) and da Vinci Skills Simulators: A Randomized Control Study.

Authors:  Cho Rok Lee; Seoung Yoon Rho; Sang Hyup Han; Young Moon; Sun Young Hwang; Young Joo Kim; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery-a Fad or the Future?

Authors:  Jason M Ali; Yasir Abu-Omar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.