Comparisons of ASPECTS 5 and 6 for endovascular treatment in anterior circulation occlusive stroke.

Background Whether ASPECTS 5 and ASPECTS 6 were significantly different on clinical outcomes in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment remains unclear. We aimed to retrospectively compare the effectiveness and safety of ASPECTS 5 and ASPECTS 6 in acute anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke patients. Methods A total of 41 patients, 14 in the ASPECTS 5 group and 27 in the ASPECTS 6 group, were enrolled between January 2014 and June 2016. Modified Rankin Scale 0-2 was considered as good functional outcome. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 72 hours and mortality at 90 days were recorded. Results Good functional outcome at 90 days in the ASPECTS 5 group (0% (0/14)) was significantly lower than that in the ASPECTS 6 group (25.9% (7/27)) ( p = 0.04). Rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (21.4 (3/14) vs 18.5% (5/27), p = 0.83) and mortality (64.3% (9/14) vs 44.4% (12/27), p = 0.23) within 90 days were not significantly different. There is a trend for a lower rate of successful reperfusion in the ASPECTS 5 group (71.4% (10/14) for ASPECTS 5 vs 92.6% (25/27) for ASPECTS 6, p = 0.07). Conclusions ASPECTS 5 has very little chance to reach good functional outcome in Chinese patients with anterior circulation large-artery occlusive stroke. Future studies with large sample sizes are needed.