Literature DB >> 28728110

Development of a bioanalytical test battery for water quality monitoring: Fingerprinting identified micropollutants and their contribution to effects in surface water.

Peta A Neale1, Rolf Altenburger2, Selim Aït-Aïssa3, François Brion3, Wibke Busch2, Gisela de Aragão Umbuzeiro4, Michael S Denison5, David Du Pasquier6, Klára Hilscherová7, Henner Hollert8, Daniel A Morales4, Jiří Novák7, Rita Schlichting2, Thomas-Benjamin Seiler8, Helene Serra3, Ying Shao8, Andrew J Tindall6, Knut Erik Tollefsen9, Timothy D Williams10, Beate I Escher11.   

Abstract

Surface waters can contain a diverse range of organic pollutants, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals and industrial compounds. While bioassays have been used for water quality monitoring, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of individual micropollutants and their relationship to the overall mixture effect in water samples. In this study, a battery of in vitro bioassays based on human and fish cell lines and whole organism assays using bacteria, algae, daphnids and fish embryos was assembled for use in water quality monitoring. The selection of bioassays was guided by the principles of adverse outcome pathways in order to cover relevant steps in toxicity pathways known to be triggered by environmental water samples. The effects of 34 water pollutants, which were selected based on hazard quotients, available environmental quality standards and mode of action information, were fingerprinted in the bioassay test battery. There was a relatively good agreement between the experimental results and available literature effect data. The majority of the chemicals were active in the assays indicative of apical effects, while fewer chemicals had a response in the specific reporter gene assays, but these effects were typically triggered at lower concentrations. The single chemical effect data were used to improve published mixture toxicity modeling of water samples from the Danube River. While there was a slight increase in the fraction of the bioanalytical equivalents explained for the Danube River samples, for some endpoints less than 1% of the observed effect could be explained by the studied chemicals. The new mixture models essentially confirmed previous findings from many studies monitoring water quality using both chemical analysis and bioanalytical tools. In short, our results indicate that many more chemicals contribute to the biological effect than those that are typically quantified by chemical monitoring programs or those regulated by environmental quality standards. This study not only demonstrates the utility of fingerprinting single chemicals for an improved understanding of the biological effect of pollutants, but also highlights the need to apply bioassays for water quality monitoring in order to prevent underestimation of the overall biological effect.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-based bioassay; Fish embryo toxicity test; In vitro; In vivo; Mixture toxicity; ToxCast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28728110     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  30 in total

1.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Risk Characterization of Environmental Samples Using In Vitro Bioactivity and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations Data.

Authors:  Zunwei Chen; Dillon Lloyd; Yi-Hui Zhou; Weihsueh A Chiu; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  The Eco-Exposome Concept: Supporting an Integrated Assessment of Mixtures of Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Scholz; John W Nichols; Beate I Escher; Gerald T Ankley; Rolf Altenburger; Brett Blackwell; Werner Brack; Lawrence Burkhard; Timothy W Collette; Jon A Doering; Drew Ekman; Kellie Fay; Fabian Fischer; Jörg Hackermüller; Joel C Hoffman; Chih Lai; David Leuthold; Dalma Martinovic-Weigelt; Thorsten Reemtsma; Nathan Pollesch; Anthony Schroeder; Gerrit Schüürmann; Martin von Bergen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.218

5.  Mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) and mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP) but not di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) bind productively to the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ.

Authors:  Isabel Kratochvil; Tommy Hofmann; Sandra Rother; Rita Schlichting; Rocco Moretti; Dieter Scharnweber; Vera Hintze; Beate I Escher; Jens Meiler; Stefan Kalkhof; Martin von Bergen
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Tracking complex mixtures of chemicals in our changing environment.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Heather M Stapleton; Emma L Schymanski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Steroid hormones and estrogenic activity in the wastewater outfall and receiving waters of the Chascomús chained shallow lakes system (Argentina).

Authors:  Anelisa González; Kevin J Kroll; Cecilia Silva-Sanchez; Pedro Carriquiriborde; Juan I Fernandino; Nancy D Denslow; Gustavo M Somoza
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Combining in vitro reporter gene bioassays with chemical analysis to assess changes in the water quality along the Ammer River, Southwestern Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian E Müller; Beate I Escher; Marc Schwientek; Martina Werneburg; Christiane Zarfl; Christian Zwiener
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.893

Review 9.  Harvesting the promise of AOPs: An assessment and recommendations.

Authors:  Annamaria Carusi; Mark R Davies; Giovanni De Grandis; Beate I Escher; Geoff Hodges; Kenneth M Y Leung; Maurice Whelan; Catherine Willett; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Triclosan Lacks Anti-Estrogenic Effects in Zebrafish Cells but Modulates Estrogen Response in Zebrafish Embryos.

Authors:  Hélène Serra; François Brion; Jean-Marc Porcher; Hélène Budzinski; Selim Aït-Aïssa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.