Literature DB >> 28727937

Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Benedict U Nwachukwu1, Brenda Chang1, Pramod B Voleti2, Patricia Berkanish1, Matthew R Cohn1, David W Altchek1, Answorth A Allen1, Riley J Williams1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increased interest in understanding the preoperative determinants of postoperative outcomes. Return to play (RTP) and the patient-reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are useful measures of postoperative outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
PURPOSE: To define the MCID after ACLR and to investigate the role of preoperative outcome scores for predicting the MCID and RTP after ACLR. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: There were 294 active athletes enrolled as part of an institutional ACL registry with a minimum 2-year follow-up who were eligible for inclusion. A questionnaire was administered to elicit factors associated with RTP. Patient demographic and clinical data as well as patient-reported outcome measures were captured as part of the registry. Outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Lysholm scale, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). Preoperative outcome score thresholds predictive of RTP were determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) with area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The MCID was calculated using a distribution-based method. Multivariable logistic models were fitted to identify predictors for achieving the MCID and RTP.
RESULTS: At a mean (±SD) follow-up of 3.7 ± 0.7 years, 231 patients were included from a total 294 eligible patients. The mean age and body mass index were 26.7 ± 12.5 years and 23.7 ± 3.2 kg/m2, respectively. Of the 231 patients, 201 (87.0%) returned to play at a mean time of 10.1 months. Two-year postoperative scores on all measures were significantly increased from preoperative scores (IKDC: 50.1 ± 15.6 to 87.4 ± 10.7; Lysholm: 61.2 ± 18.1 to 89.5 ± 10.4; SF-12 PCS: 41.5 ± 9.0 to 54.7 ± 4.6; SF-12 MCS: 53.6 ± 8.1 to 55.7 ± 5.7; P < .001 for all). The corresponding MCID values were 9.0 (IKDC), 10.0 (Lysholm), 5.1 (SF-12 PCS), and 4.3 (SF-12 MCS). Preoperative score thresholds predictive of RTP were the following: IKDC, 60.9; Lysholm, 57.0; SF-12 PCS, 42.3; and SF-12 MCS, 48.3. These thresholds were not independently predictive but achieved significance as part of the multivariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis for RTP, preoperative SF-12 PCS scores above 42.3 (odds ratio [OR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.09-7.62) and SF-12 MCS scores above 48.3 (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 1.80-10.98) were predictive for achieving RTP; an ACL allograft (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.06-1.00) was negatively predictive of RTP. In the multivariable analysis for the MCID, patients with higher preoperative scores were less likely to achieve the MCID ( P < .0001); however, a higher preoperative SF-12 MCS score was predictive of achieving the MCID on the IKDC form (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.11-1.52) and Lysholm scale (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16). Medial meniscal injuries, older age, and white race were also associated with a decreased likelihood for achieving the MCID.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative SF-12 MCS and PCS scores were predictive of RTP after ACLR; patients scoring above 42.3 on the SF-12 PCS and 48.3 on the SF-12 MCS were more likely to achieve RTP. Additionally, we defined the MCID after ACLR and found that higher SF-12 MCS scores were predictive of achieving the MCID on knee-specific questionnaires.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SF-12; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; health-related quality of life; minimal clinically important difference; patient-reported outcome; return to play

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28727937     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517714472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  31 in total

1.  The Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Patients Undergoing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

Authors:  Takahiro Ogura; Jakob Ackermann; Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner; Gergo Merkely; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Maximum subjective outcome improvement is reported by 3 Months following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua P Castle; Lafi S Khalil; Muhammad J Abbas; Stephanie DeBolle; Marissa Tandron; Austin G Cross; Guillermo A Rodriguez; Kelechi R Okoroha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-14

3.  Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT.

Authors:  Joseph Dias; Stephen Brealey; Liz Cook; Caroline Fairhurst; Sebastian Hinde; Paul Leighton; Surabhi Choudhary; Matthew Costa; Catherine Hewitt; Stephen Hodgson; Laura Jefferson; Kanagaratnam Jeyapalan; Ada Keding; Matthew Northgraves; Jared Palmer; Amar Rangan; Gerry Richardson; Nicholas Taub; Garry Tew; John Thompson; David Torgerson
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Substantial Clinical Benefit in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

Authors:  Takahiro Ogura; Jakob Ackermann; Alexandre Barbieri Mestriner; Gergo Merkely; Andreas H Gomoll
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults.

Authors:  Jorge Sayum Filho; Mário Lenza; Marcel Js Tamaoki; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-24

6.  Health-related quality of life in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Chaya N Murali; Brady Slater; Salma Musaad; David Cuthbertson; Dianne Nguyen; Alicia Turner; Mahshid Azamian; Laura Tosi; Frank Rauch; V Reid Sutton; Brendan Lee; Sandesh C S Nagamani
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 7.  Reporting Clinical Significance in Hip Arthroscopy: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Breanna A Polascik; Jeffrey Peck; Nicholas Cepeda; Stephen Lyman; Daphne Ling
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-04-12

8.  A Comparison of Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Function Between Sexes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher Kuenze; David Robert Bell; Terry L Grindstaff; Caroline Michele Lisee; Thomas Birchmeier; Ashley Triplett; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Adolescent Patients Exhibit Significant Improvements in Strength and Functional Performance From 6 to 9 Months After ACL Reconstruction With Quadriceps Autograft.

Authors:  Michael Saper; Chris Wong; Nicole Strauss
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-05

10.  Composite psychosocial risk based on the fear avoidance model in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Cluster-based analysis.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Jordan A Bley; Laura J Huston; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Hiral Master; Emily K Reinke; Mackenzie L Bird; Erica A Scaramuzza; Christine M Haug; Shannon L Mathis; Susan W Vanston; Charles L Cox; Kurt P Spindler; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.920

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.