Literature DB >> 28727316

Primary inguinal hernia: The open repair today pros and cons.

Giampiero Campanelli1, Piero Giovanni Bruni1, Andrea Morlacchi1, Francesca Lombardo1, Marta Cavalli1.   

Abstract

Open anterior repair for inguinal hernia offers several distinct advantages over endoscopic repair, especially when real-world effectiveness is taken into account. The learning curve for endoscopic techniques is long, whereas the Lichtenstein and other open tension-free techniques are easier to teach and replicate at all levels. The outcomes of Lichtenstein repairs for primary inguinal hernia as performed by non-experts and supervised residents are comparable to those of experts. Moreover, open tension-free repair does not require expensive instruments or dedicated equipment, other than the prosthetic mesh. As such, it is feasible in any operating room anywhere in the world with limited costs. In our opinion, the most important advantage offered by open tension-free repair is that it can be performed under local anesthesia. Nevertheless, local anesthesia has some disadvantages: it requires training, excellent knowledge of the anatomy and the necessary technique, patience, and gentle handling of the tissues. Open inguinal hernia repair is a procedure that every surgeon should know and be able to perform because it is necessary to treat two conditions, groin hernia recurrence after a posterior approach (both laparoscopic and open) and pubic inguinal pain syndrome.
© 2017 Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, Asia Endosurgery Task Force and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local anesthesia; minimally invasive surgery; tension-free hernia repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28727316     DOI: 10.1111/ases.12394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg        ISSN: 1758-5902


  7 in total

1.  Individual mesh size for open anterior inguinal hernia repair: an anthropometric study in Turkish male patients.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu; H Celasin; D Oztuna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of mesh-plug repair and Lichtenstein repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Wen-Xian Xie; Sheng Li; Deng-Chao Wang; Li-Yan Huang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-23

3.  Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review.

Authors:  B Pokala; P R Armijo; L Flores; D Hennings; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; F Lombardo; G Bonitta; A Morlacchi; P G Bruni; G Campanelli; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Learning inguinal hernia repair? A survey of current practice and of preferred methods of surgical residents.

Authors:  T Nazari; M E W Dankbaar; D L Sanders; M C J Anderegg; T Wiggers; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Mesh fixation technique for inguinal hernia repair: protocol for an umbrella review with integrated and updated network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suphakarn Techapongsatorn; Amarit Tansawet; Wisit Kasetsermwiriya; Oraluck Pattanaprateep; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Validity of a low-cost Lichtenstein open inguinal hernia repair simulation model for surgical training.

Authors:  T Nazari; M P Simons; M H Zeb; J J G van Merriënboer; J F Lange; T Wiggers; D R Farley
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.