Literature DB >> 28726339

Dielectric screening effect of electronic polarization and intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

Shen-Shu Sung1.   

Abstract

Recent site-resolved hydrogen exchange measurements have uncovered significant discrepancies between simulations and experimental data during protein folding, including the excessive intramolecular hydrogen bonds in simulations. This finding indicates a possibility that intramolecular charge-charge interactions have not included sufficient dielectric screening effect of the electronic polarization. Scaling down peptide atomic charges according to the optical dielectric constant is tested in this study. As a result, the number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds is lower than using unscaled atomic charges while reaching the same levels of helical contents or β-hairpin backbone hydrogen bonds, because van der Waals interactions contribute substantially to peptide folding in water. Reducing intramolecular charge-charge interactions and hydrogen bonding increases conformational search efficiency. In particular, it reduces the equilibrium helical content in simulations using AMBER force field and the energy barrier in folding simulations using CHARMM force field.
© 2017 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atomic charge scaling; computational costs; conformational search efficiency; electronic polarization effect; intramolecular hydrogen bonds

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726339      PMCID: PMC5606545          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  28 in total

1.  Ionic permeation free energy in gramicidin: a semimicroscopic perspective.

Authors:  Vladimir L Dorman; Peter C Jordan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Alexander D Mackerell; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Atomistic folding simulations of the five-helix bundle protein λ(6−85).

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Vincent A Voelz; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 5.  Accounting for electronic polarization in non-polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Igor Leontyev; Alexei Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Dynamic hydration shell restores Kauzmann's 1959 explanation of how the hydrophobic factor drives protein folding.

Authors:  Robert L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The dielectric constant of a folded protein.

Authors:  M K Gilson; B H Honig
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Simple liquid models with corrected dielectric constants.

Authors:  Christopher J Fennell; Libo Li; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins.

Authors:  Yue Shi; Zhen Xia; Jiajing Zhang; Robert Best; Chuanjie Wu; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  1 in total

1.  Poly(β-cyclodextrin)-Activated Carbon Gel Composites for Removal of Pesticides from Water.

Authors:  Gianluca Utzeri; Luis Verissimo; Dina Murtinho; Alberto A C C Pais; F Xavier Perrin; Fabio Ziarelli; Tanta-Verona Iordache; Andrei Sarbu; Artur J M Valente
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.