Literature DB >> 28726223

Comprehensive study on parameter sensitivity for flow and nutrient modeling in the Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran model.

Chuan Luo1, Zhaofu Li2, Min Wu1, Kaixia Jiang1, Xiaomin Chen1, Hengpeng Li3.   

Abstract

Numerous parameters are used to construct the HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran) model, which results in significant difficulty in calibrating the model. Parameter sensitivity analysis is an efficient method to identify important model parameters. Through this method, a model's calibration process can be simplified on the basis of understanding the model's structure. This study investigated the sensitivity of the flow and nutrient parameters of HSPF using the DSA (differential sensitivity analysis) method in the Xitiaoxi watershed, China. The results showed that flow was mostly affected by parameters related to groundwater and evapotranspiration, including DEEPFR (fraction of groundwater inflow to deep recharge), LZETP (lower-zone evapotranspiration parameter), and AGWRC (base groundwater recession), and most of the sensitive parameters had negative and nonlinear effects on flow. Additionally, nutrient components were commonly affected by parameters from land processes, including MON-SQOLIM (monthly values limiting storage of water quality in overland flow), MON-ACCUM (monthly values of accumulation), MON-IFLW-CONC (monthly concentration of water quality in interflow), and MON-GRND-CONC (monthly concentration of water quality in active groundwater). Besides, parameters from river systems, KATM20 (unit oxidation rate of total ammonia at 20 °C) had a negative and almost linear effect on ammonia concentration and MALGR (maximal unit algal growth rate for phytoplankton) had a negative and nonlinear effect on ammonia and orthophosphate concentrations. After calibrating these sensitive parameters, our model performed well for simulating flow and nutrient outputs, with R 2 and ENS (Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency) both greater than 0.75 for flow and greater than 0.5 for nutrient components. This study is expected to serve as a valuable complement to the documentation of the HSPF model to help users identify key parameters and provide a reference for performing sensitivity analyses on other models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DSA; HSPF model; Hydrology; Nutrients; Parameter sensitivity analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28726223     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9741-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  7 in total

1.  Continental-scale effects of nutrient pollution on stream ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Guy Woodward; Mark O Gessner; Paul S Giller; Vladislav Gulis; Sally Hladyz; Antoine Lecerf; Björn Malmqvist; Brendan G McKie; Scott D Tiegs; Helen Cariss; Mike Dobson; Arturo Elosegi; Verónica Ferreira; Manuel A S Graça; Tadeusz Fleituch; Jean O Lacoursière; Marius Nistorescu; Jesús Pozo; Geta Risnoveanu; Markus Schindler; Angheluta Vadineanu; Lena B-M Vought; Eric Chauvet
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Temporal scale-induced uncertainty in load duration curves for instream-dissolved oxygen.

Authors:  Abhijit Patil; Zhiqiang Deng; Ronald F Malone
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland.

Authors:  Ahmed Nasr; Michael Bruen; Philip Jordan; Richard Moles; Gerard Kiely; Paul Byrne
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Simulation of runoff and nutrient export from a typical small watershed in China using the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran.

Authors:  Zhaofu Li; Hongyu Liu; Chuan Luo; Yan Li; Hengpeng Li; Jianjun Pan; Xiaosan Jiang; Quansuo Zhou; Zhengqin Xiong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Integrated hydrological and water quality model for river management: a case study on Lena River.

Authors:  André Fonseca; Cidália Botelho; Rui A R Boaventura; Vítor J P Vilar
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Evaluation of the AnnAGNPS Model for Predicting Runoff and Nutrient Export in a Typical Small Watershed in the Hilly Region of Taihu Lake.

Authors:  Chuan Luo; Zhaofu Li; Hengpeng Li; Xiaomin Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  HSPF-based watershed-scale water quality modeling and uncertainty analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Roostaee; Zhiqiang Deng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A systematic assessment of watershed-scale nonpoint source pollution during rainfall-runoff events in the Miyun Reservoir watershed.

Authors:  Jiali Qiu; Zhenyao Shen; Guoyuan Wei; Guobo Wang; Hui Xie; Guanping Lv
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Using vegetation correction coefficient to modify a dynamic particulate nutrient loss model for monthly nitrogen and phosphorus load predictions: a case study in a small loess hilly watershed.

Authors:  Lei Wu; Gouxia Li; Jun Jiang; Xiaoyi Ma
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comprehensive Performance Evaluation for Hydrological and Nutrients Simulation Using the Hydrological Simulation Program-Fortran in a Mesoscale Monsoon Watershed, China.

Authors:  Zhaofu Li; Chuan Luo; Kaixia Jiang; Rongrong Wan; Hengpeng Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.