Literature DB >> 28725988

Interim 18F-FGD PET/CT may not predict the outcome in primary central nervous system lymphoma patients treated with sequential treatment with methotrexate and cytarabine.

Jae-Cheol Jo1,2, Dok Hyun Yoon1, Shin Kim1, Kyoungmin Lee1, Eun Hee Kang1, Jung Sun Park1, Jin-Sook Ryu3, Jooryung Huh4, Chan-Sik Park4, Jong Hoon Kim5, Sang Wook Lee6, Cheolwon Suh7.   

Abstract

18F-fluoro-2-dexoy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is a useful imaging technique for monitoring the treatment response in lymphoma cases. We investigated the value of interim brain PET/CT (I-PET/CT) for monitoring the response to intensive methotrexate-based chemotherapy in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Of the 76 PCNSL patients treated with intensive methotrexate and cytarabine chemotherapy between September 2006 and December 2012, 66 patients with DLBCL were included in this study. The patient cohort of 66 individuals comprised 43 men and 23 women with a median age of 59 years (range, 17-75 years). During chemotherapy, 36 patients (54.5%) showed a negative metabolism on I-PET/CT, and 47 (71.2%) were negative on final (F) PET/CT. The baseline characteristics were similar between I-PET/CT-negative (n = 36) and I-PET/CT-positive patients (n = 30) except ECOG performance status. After a median follow-up of 27.5 months, there was no difference in the progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.701) or overall survival (OS; P = 0.620) between the I-PET/CT-negative and I-PET/CT-positive groups. However, PFS in the F-PET/CT-negative group was significantly longer than that in the F-PET/CT-positive group (P < 0.001) without a significant difference in OS (P = 0.892). I-PET/CT may not predict the survival outcome of PCNSL patients with DLBCL treated with intensive methotrexate and cytarabine chemotherapy. Prospective trials are required to fully evaluate the role of I-PET/CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interim PET/CT; Methotrexate; Primary central nervous system lymphoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28725988     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-017-3068-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  9 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma.

Authors:  Domenico Albano; Giovanni Bosio; Mattia Bertoli; Raffaele Giubbini; Francesco Bertagna
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Prognostic value of early 18F-FDG PET scanning evaluation in immunocompetent primary CNS lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Rudy Birsen; Estelle Blanc; Lise Willems; Barbara Burroni; Marielle Legoff; Emmanuelle Le Ray; Sylvain Pilorge; Sawsen Salah; Aude Quentin; Benedicte Deau; Patricia Franchi; Marguerite Vignon; Laurence Mabille; Charles Nguyen; Yioula Kirova; Pascale Varlet; Myriam Edjlali; Edouard Dezamis; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Carole Soussain; Caroline Houillier; Diane Damotte; Johan Pallud; Didier Bouscary; Jerome Tamburini
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 3.  PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area.

Authors:  Antoine Verger; Aurélie Kas; Jacques Darcourt; Eric Guedj
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma.

Authors:  Laura Rozenblum; Caroline Houillier; Carole Soussain; Marc Bertaux; Sylvain Choquet; Damien Galanaud; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Aurélie Kas
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Clinical Value of PET.CT Based on Big Data in Colorectal and Peritoneal Metastatic Cancer.

Authors:  Lili Xiang; Chuanhua Yang; Wenneng Liu; Dong Li; Zongze Jiang; Huijun Zhou
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.009

6.  Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in primary central nervous system lymphoma-a narrative review.

Authors:  Simone Krebs; Julia G Barasch; Robert J Young; Christian Grommes; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Ann Lymphoma       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 7.  Primary CNS Lymphomas: Challenges in Diagnosis and Monitoring.

Authors:  C Chiavazza; A Pellerino; F Ferrio; A Cistaro; R Soffietti; R Rudà
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Extent of radiological response does not reflect survival in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

Authors:  Matthijs van der Meulen; Alida A Postma; Marion Smits; Katerina Bakunina; Monique C Minnema; Tatjana Seute; Gavin Cull; Roelien H Enting; Marjolein van der Poel; Wendy B C Stevens; Dieta Brandsma; Aart Beeker; Jeanette K Doorduijn; Samar Issa; Martin J van den Bent; Jacoline E C Bromberg
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 9.  On point in primary CNS lymphoma.

Authors:  Mazie Tsang; Joseph Cleveland; James L Rubenstein
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.271

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.