| Literature DB >> 28725868 |
Md Rezaur Rahman1, Sinin Hamdan2, Josephine Chang Hui Lai1, Mohammad Jawaid3, Fahmi Asyadi Bin Md Yusof4.
Abstract
In this study, the physical, morphological, mechanical and thermal properties of furfuryl alcohol/2-ethylhexyl methacrylate/halloysite nanoclay wood polymer nanocomposites (FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs) were investigated. FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs were prepared via an impregnation method and the properties of the nanocomposites were characterized through the weight percent gain, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), three-point flexural test, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis and moisture absorption test. The weight percent gain in the 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNC was the highest compared with the raw wood (RW) and other WPNCs. The FT-IR results confirmed that polymerization took place in the nanocomposites, especially 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNC, which had a reduced amount of hydroxyl groups. The SEM results revealed that the 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNC had the smoothest and most uniform surface among all of the nanocomposites. The 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNC showed the highest flexural strength and modulus of elasticity. The results revealed that the storage modulus and loss modulus of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs were higher and the tan δ of FA-co-EHMA-HNC WNPCs was lower compared with the RW. The FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs exhibited the higher thermal stability in the TGA and DSC analysis. The 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNC exhibited remarkably lower moisture absorption compared with the RW. Overall, this study proved that the ratio 50:50 FA-co-EHMA ratio was the most suitable for introduction in the in the RW.Entities:
Keywords: Materials science; Nanotechnology
Year: 2017 PMID: 28725868 PMCID: PMC5502732 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Preparation of the polymer system with different ratios.
| Volume of furfuryl alcohol (FA) (mL) | Volume of 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) (mL) | Amount of halloysite clay (HNC) (g) | Amount of benzoyl peroxide (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 200 | 2 | 5 |
| 100 | 100 | 2 | 5 |
| 140 | 60 | 2 | 5 |
| 200 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Average weight percent gain (WPG) of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
| Sample | Average weight before impregnation (g) | Average weight after impregnation (g) | Weight percent gain, WPG (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| RW | 70.756 | 71.023 | 0.376 |
| FA-HNC WPNCs | 58.703 | 61.967 | 5.267 |
| 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 43.079 | 60.381 | 28.655 |
| 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 48.479 | 64.753 | 25.132 |
| EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 46.810 | 53.779 | 12.959 |
Fig. 1FT-IR spectra of the (a) RW (b) FA-HNC WPNCs (c) 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (d) 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (e) EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Summary of the functional groups in the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
| Functional groups detected | Peak (cm−1) |
|---|---|
| -OH | 3400 cm−1 |
| C-H | 2900 cm−1 |
| C=O | 1735 cm−1, 1730 cm−1 |
| C-O-H | 1350 cm−1 |
Fig. 2Proposed schematic reaction diagram of the condensation of FA and the reaction of FA, EHMA and HNC.
Fig. 3SEM micrographs of the (a) RW (b) FA-HNC WPNCs (c) 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (d) 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (e) EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Fig. 4Flexural strength of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Fig. 5Modulus of elasticity of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Fig. 6Storage modulus versus temperature of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Fig. 7Tangent δ versus temperature of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Fig. 8TGA curves of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
Activation energy of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs determined by the Arrhenius equation.
| Sample | Ti (°C) | Tm (°C) | Tf (°C) | WTi (%) | WTm (°C) | WTf (°C) | Activation Energy, Ea(kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RW | 84.0 | 360.0 | 456.0 | 96.3 | 51.1 | 13.1 | 1120.9 |
| FA-HNC WPNCs | 78.0 | 360.0 | 468.0 | 96.1 | 51.6 | 18.8 | 1399.9 |
| 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 78.0 | 360.0 | 486.0 | 96.4 | 57.3 | 22.9 | 2211.9 |
| 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 78.0 | 360.0 | 480.0 | 96.2 | 53.0 | 23.1 | 2021.6 |
| EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 78.0 | 360.0 | 468.0 | 96.1 | 51.7 | 21.9 | 1701.0 |
Temperature corresponding to the beginning of decomposition.
Temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of mass loss.
Temperature corresponding to the end of decomposition.
Mass loss at the temperature corresponding to the beginning of decomposition.
Mass loss at the temperature corresponding to the maximum rate of mass loss.
Mass loss at the temperature corresponding to the end of decomposition.
Fig. 9DSC curves of the (a) RW (b) FA-HNC WPNCs (c) 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (d) 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs (e) EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
DSC of RW and different ratio of FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.
| Sample | Endotherm peaks (°C) | Bond Dissociation Enthalpy (J/g) |
|---|---|---|
| RW | 139.33 | 7.64 |
| FA-HNC WPNCs | 196.00 | 19.51 |
| 50:50 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 183.18 | 83.17 |
| 70:30 FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 192.16 | 61.98 |
| EHMA-HNC WPNCs | 191.86 | 55.30 |
Fig. 10Moisture absorption curves of the RW and different ratios of the FA-co-EHMA-HNC WPNCs.