Literature DB >> 28725760

Interventions to Educate Family Physicians to Change Test Ordering: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Roger Edmund Thomas1, Marcus Vaska2, Christopher Naugler1,3, Tanvir Turin Chowdhury1.   

Abstract

The purpose is to systematically review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to change family physicians' laboratory test-ordering. We searched 15 electronic databases (no language/date limitations). We identified 29 RCTs (4,111 physicians, 175,563 patients). Six studies specifically focused on reducing unnecessary tests, 23 on increasing screening tests. Using Cochrane methodology 48.5% of studies were low risk-of-bias for randomisation, 7% concealment of randomisation, 17% blinding of participants/personnel, 21% blinding outcome assessors, 27.5% attrition, 93% selective reporting. Only six studies were low risk for both randomisation and attrition. Twelve studies performed a power computation, three an intention-to-treat analysis and 13 statistically controlled clustering. Unweighted averages were computed to compare intervention/control groups for tests assessed by >5 studies. The results were that fourteen studies assessed lipids (average 10% more tests than control), 14 diabetes (average 8% > control), 5 cervical smears, 2 INR, one each thyroid, fecal occult-blood, cotinine, throat-swabs, testing after prescribing, and urine-cultures. Six studies aimed to decrease test groups (average decrease 18%), and two to increase test groups. Intervention strategies: one study used education (no change): two feedback (one 5% increase, one 27% desired decrease); eight education + feedback (average increase in desired direction >control 4.9%), ten system change (average increase 14.9%), one system change + feedback (increases 5-44%), three education + system change (average increase 6%), three education + system change + feedback (average 7.7% increase), one delayed testing. The conclusions are that only six RCTs were assessed at low risk of bias from both randomisation and attrition. Nevertheless, despite methodological shortcomings studies that found large changes (e.g. >20%) probably obtained real change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  family doctors; lab tests; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trials; systematic review

Year:  2016        PMID: 28725760      PMCID: PMC5497906          DOI: 10.1177/2374289516633476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Pathol        ISSN: 2374-2895


  75 in total

1.  The efficacy of an automated feedback system for general practitioners.

Authors:  Rianne Bindels; Arie Hasman; Arnold D Kester; Jan L Talmon; Paul A De Clercq; Ron A G Winkens
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2003

2.  Cessation of dipstick urinalysis reflex testing and physician ordering behavior.

Authors:  Paul Froom; Mira Barak
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  The Belgian Improvement Study on Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Neree Claes; Frank Buntinx; Johan Vijgen; Jef Arnout; Jos Vermylen; Steffen Fieuws; Herman Van Loon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruth E Thomas; Bernard Lewis Croal; Craig Ramsay; Martin Eccles; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards.

Authors:  D F Lobach; W E Hammond
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Laboratory test use and primary care physician supply.

Authors:  Christopher Naugler
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Evaluating the effectiveness of 2 educational interventions in family practice.

Authors:  A E Borgiel; J I Williams; D A Davis; E V Dunn; N Hobbs; B Hutchison; C R Wilson; J Jensen; J J O'Neil; M J Bass
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  I Hetlevik; J Holmen; O Krüger; P Kristensen; H Iversen
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Analysis of medical prescribing practices for hepatitis B serology tests.

Authors:  A Girard; A Moreau-Gaudry; Prométhée Alpes Réseau; M-N Hilleret
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2010-01

10.  The effect on cost of medical care for patients treated with an automated clinical audit system.

Authors:  J C Thomas; A Moore; P E Qualls
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.460

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of an intervention to reduce population-based screening for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christopher Naugler; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Hude Quan; Fiona Clement; Tolulope Sajobi; Roger Thomas; Tanvir C Turin; William Hnydyk; Alex Chin; James Wesenberg
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-01-17

2.  Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Potential Prescribing Omissions in 82,935 Older Hospitalised Adults: Association with Hospital Readmission and Mortality Within Six Months.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Leonard T Nguyen; Dave Jackson; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12

Review 3.  Explaining variations in test ordering in primary care: protocol for a realist review.

Authors:  Claire Duddy; Geoffrey Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.