| Literature DB >> 28725151 |
Bouzid Djihane1, Nouioua Wafa2, Soltani Elkhamssa3, De Haro Juan Pedro4, Angeles Esteban Maria5, Zerroug Mohamed Mihoub1.
Abstract
The aerial parts of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don were subjected to hydrodistillation to obtain essential oils which had been analyzed by gas chromatography and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry and tested for antimicrobial activity against 12 bacteria, two yeasts and four fungi by agar diffusion method. The essential oil yielded 0.44% (v/w) and 67 compounds accounting for 99.24% of the oil were identified with a high content of oxygenated sesquiterpenes (61.42%). The most oxygenated sesquiterpene compounds were α-Cedrene (13.61%), α-Curcumene (11.41%), Geranyl acetate (10.05%), Limonene (6.07%), Nerol (5.04%), Neryl acetate (4.91%) and α-Pinene (3.78%). The antimicrobial activity of the essential oil was assayed by using the disk diffusion method on Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Micrococcus luteus ATCC 4698, Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 4352, Enterococcus cereus ATCC 2035, Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 9372, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 49452, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 35659, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313 and yeasts Candida albicans ATCC 10231, Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763 and fungi, Fusarium solani var. coeruleum, Aspergillus niger, Alternaria alternata, Ascochyta rabiei. H. italicum inhibited the growth of all the tested microorganisms except three bacteria, E. coli ATCC 25922, K. pneumonia ATCC 4352 and L. monocytogenes ATCC 15313. The most sensitive bacterium was E. cereus ATCC 2035 with minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of 0.79 μg ml-1. A minimum fungistatic and fungicide concentration of 6.325 μg ml-1 and 12.65 μg ml-1 respectively was obtained with C. albicans ATCC 10231 and S. cerevisiae ATCC 9763. However the four fungi were more resistant with fungistatic minimum concentration ranging from 6.325 μg ml-1 to 50.6 μg ml-1 and a fungicide minimum concentration of 50.6 μg ml-1. This antimicrobial activity could be attributed to the essential oil chemical composition. Thus this study represents a first step in the study of the chemical composition of H. italicum (Roth) G. Don collected from north Algeria and its antimicrobial properties.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Antifungal activity; Chemical composition; Essential oil; GC–MS; Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don
Year: 2016 PMID: 28725151 PMCID: PMC5506734 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Pharm J ISSN: 1319-0164 Impact factor: 4.330
Figure 1Photography of aerial parts of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don collected from the North of Algeria.
Percentage chemical composition and retention indices of the essential oil extracted from Helichrsyum italicum growing wild in the North of Algeria.
| Pic | RT | Compound | RI | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.908 | Ethylether | 529 | 0.04 | |
| 5.358 | Methyl butanoate | 721 | 0.22 | |
| 7.203 | 2-Methyl-2-heptene | 981 | 0.29 | |
| 8,672 | 2-methyl-Hexanoic acid | 1027 | 0.53 | |
| 11.083 | δ-3-Carene | 1008 | ||
| 12.219 | α-Pinene | 932 | ||
| 12.662 | α-Fenchene | 945 | ||
| 13.751 | β-Pinene | 974 | ||
| 14.38 | Cyclopentanol | 780 | 0.28 | |
| 14.794 | Isopropyl-2-methyl butyrate | 880 | 0.37 | |
| 15.204 | Terpinolene | 1086 | 0.40 | |
| 15.364 | 1015 | 0.15 | ||
| 15.504 | 1020 | |||
| 15.506 | Limonene | 1024 | ||
| 16.331 | (E)-β-ocimène | 1044 | 0.37 | |
| 16.466 | 2-Butenoic acid, 3-methyl | 881 | ||
| 16.665 | γ-Terpinen | 1054 | ||
| 17.767 | 2-Nonanone | 1087 | 0.46 | |
| 17.952 | 3-Hexanone | 945 | 0.34 | |
| 18.096 | Linalool | 1095 | ||
| 18.172 | Isovaleric acid | 827 | 0.23 | |
| 18.483 | (+)−Fenchol | 1114 | 0.12 | |
| 19.067 | Adamantane | 1118 | 0.11 | |
| 19.684 | Borneol | 1165 | 0.25 | |
| 19.912 | α-Terpineol | 1014 | ||
| 20.11 | 3-Pentanone | 788 | ||
| 20.279 | Myrtenol | 1194 | 0.18 | |
| 20.667 | 1182 | 0,15 | ||
| 20.841 | Nerol | 1227 | ||
| 20.993 | Neral | 1235 | 0.12 | |
| 21.064 | Camphene | 946 | 0.09 | |
| 21.419 | Geraniol | 1249 | 0.06 | |
| 21.541 | Linalool | 1095 | 0.15 | |
| 21.651 | Bornyl acetate | 1284 | 0.05 | |
| 21.706 | 2-Undecanone | 1293 | 0.3 | |
| 21.761 | 1300 | 0.07 | ||
| 22.436 | 1346 | 0.09 | ||
| 22.589 | Geranyl acetate | 1379 | ||
| 22.812 | 1410 | |||
| 22.863 | 1.3.8-ρ-Menthatriene | 1108 | 0.58 | |
| 22.943 | 1400 | 0.18 | ||
| 23.201 | α-Bergamotene | 1411 | ||
| 23.311 | Caryophyllene | 1417 | 0.48 | |
| 23.458 | α-curcumene | 1479 | ||
| 23.547 | Neryl acetate | 1359 | ||
| 23.678 | β-Himachalene | 1500 | ||
| 24,239 | Acetic acid | 1393 | ||
| 24,539 | (Z)-Nerolidol | 1531 | ||
| 24,725 | β-curcumene | 1514 | ||
| 24,865 | 1200 | 0 | ||
| 24,945 | Guaiol | 1600 | ||
| 25,084 | Anisole | 913 | ||
| 25.173 | 1492 | 0.33 | ||
| 25.265 | 1071 | |||
| 25.43 | 1652 | |||
| 25.51 | Bulnesol | 1670 | 0.59 | |
| 25.624 | (Z)-α- | 1690 | 0.35 | |
| 25.764 | 1522 | 0.14 | ||
| 25.869 | 1226 | 0.11 | ||
| 25.916 | Dehydro-1.8-Cineole | 988 | 0.39 | |
| 26.074 | ο-Cresol | 1050 | 0.12 | |
| 26.456 | Eugenol | 1356 | 0.62 | |
| 26.566 | Geranyl butanoate | 1562 | 0.2 | |
| 26.663 | 2-Pentadecanone | 1697 | 0.2 | |
| 30.573 | 2,3-dimethyl-Benzofuran | 1219 | 0.21 | |
| Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 10.83 | |||
| Oxygen-containing monoterpene | 18.95 | |||
| Oxygen–containing Sesquiterpenes | 61.42 | |||
| Acids | 4.48 | |||
| Others | 2.17 | |||
Bold means the highest percentage of the compounds of the essential oil.
Figure 2Percentage of the different chemical groups of components present in H. italicum essential oil. MH: Monoterpene hydrocarbons; OCM: Oxygen-containing monoterpene; OCS: Oxygene–containing Sesquiterpenes; Ac: Acids; Other: other compound.
Antibacterial activity of H. italicum essential oil measured as diameter of inhibition.
| Bacterial strains | Control | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | 1/2 | 1/5 | 1/10 | GEN | DMSO | |
| – | – | – | – | 33 | – | |
| 27 ± 0.1 | 23 ± 0.2 | 16 ± 0.2 | – | 25 | – | |
| 30 ± 0.2 | 21 ± 0.6 | 17 ± 0.4 | – | 24 | – | |
| – | – | – | – | 21 | – | |
| 17 ± 0.4 | 15 ± 0.2 | – | – | 22 | – | |
| 21 ± 0.2 | 19 ± 0.6 | 13 ± 0.1 | – | 30 | – | |
| 23 ± 0.5 | 18 ± 0.3 | 14 ± 0.2 | – | 33 | – | |
| 19 ± 0.2 | 16 ± 0.1 | – | – | 33 | – | |
| 18 ± 0.4 | 12 ± 0.2 | 09 ± 0.1 | – | 26 | – | |
| 19 ± 0.5 | 17 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 0.3 | – | 30 | – | |
| 18 ± 0.2 | 12 ± 0.4 | 07 ± 0.1 | – | 25 | – | |
| – | – | – | – | 23 | – | |
– Indicates no growth inhibition. Gent. (Gentamicin) positive control; DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxid) negative control.
Antifungal activity of H. italicum essential oil measured as diameter of inhibition (mm).
| Fungi strains | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | 1/2 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 5-FC | DMSO | |
| 29 ± 0.2 | 22 ± 0.4 | 13 ± 0.1 | – | 24 | – | |
| 27 ± 0.7 | 21 ± 0.2 | 11 ± 0.3 | – | 30 | – | |
| 13 ± 0.4 | 12 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.1 | – | 27 | – | |
| 14 ± 0.2 | 11 ± 0.5 | 08 ± 0.2 | – | 65 | – | |
| 11 ± 0.4 | 07 ± 0.1 | – | – | 34 | – | |
| 14 ± 0.8 | 12 ± 0.4 | 10 ± 0.1 | – | 28 | – | |
– Indicates no growth inhibition. 5-FC (5-Fluorocytosin) positive control; DMSO (Dimethyl sulfoxid) negative control.
Minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) concentrations of H. italicum essential oil.
| Bacterial strain | MIC (μg ml−1) | MBC (μg ml−1) | MBC/MIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50.6 | 50.6 | 1 | |
| 6.325 | 12.65 | 2 | |
| 0.79 | 0.79 | 1 | |
| 3.162 | 12.65 | 4 | |
| 25.3 | 25.3 | 1 | |
| 12.65 | 50.6 | 4 | |
| 12.65 | 12.65 | 1 | |
| 50.6 | 101.2 | 2 | |
| 1.581 | 3.162 | 2 |
Fungistatic minimum concentrations MFCS and fungicide MFCC of H. italicum essential oil.
| Fungal strain | MFCS (μg ml−1) | MFCC (μg ml−1) | MFCC/MFCS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.325 | 12.65 | 2 | |
| 6.325 | 12.65 | 2 | |
| 50.6 | 50.6 | 1 | |
| 25.3 | 50.6 | 2 | |
| 25.3 | 50.6 | 2 | |
| 50.6 | 50.6 | 1 |