Literature DB >> 28725116

Towards an improved estimate of antimicrobial use in animals: Adjusting the "population correction unit" calculation.

Brian R Radke1.   

Abstract

International comparisons of animal antimicrobial use (AMU) have typically been based on total national estimates of antimicrobials sales standardized by the national animal biomass calculated as the population correction unit (PCU). The objective of this paper was to compare the currently accepted PCU calculation with that of the adjusted population correction unit (APCU), which re-evaluates the standard animal weights used in the calculation and accounts for animal lifespan. The APCU calculation resulted in substantial changes to the 2009 national biomass estimates for cattle, pigs, and poultry in 8 European countries and Canada. The estimated national biomass for cattle increased 35% to 43%, while the estimated national biomass of pigs and poultry typically decreased by approximately 51% and 87%, respectively. Among the 9 countries, the total national APCU ranged from an increase of 1% to a decrease of 40% relative to PCU, and these differences were statistically significant. Adjusted population correction unit is preferred over PCU in comparing and contrasting AMU among animals with different lifespans because it is more transparently derived and is a reasonable approximation of the animal biomass at risk of antimicrobial treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28725116      PMCID: PMC5508379     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  2 in total

Review 1.  Veterinary antimicrobial-usage statistics based on standardized measures of dosage.

Authors:  V F Jensen; E Jacobsen; F Bager
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 2.670

2.  Comparing antimicrobial exposure based on sales data.

Authors:  Nico Bondt; Vibeke Frøkjær Jensen; Linda F Puister-Jansen; Ingeborg M van Geijlswijk
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.670

  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial Usage in Animal Production: A Review of the Literature with a Focus on Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Nguyen V Cuong; Pawin Padungtod; Guy Thwaites; Juan J Carrique-Mas
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-15

2.  Calculation of Antimicrobial Use Indicators in Beef Feedlots-Effects of Choice of Metric and Standardized Values.

Authors:  Stephanie A Brault; Sherry J Hannon; Sheryl P Gow; Simon J G Otto; Calvin W Booker; Paul S Morley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-09

3.  Comparison of different antimicrobial use indicators and antimicrobial resistance data in food-producing animals.

Authors:  Pim Sanders; Dik Mevius; Kees Veldman; Inge van Geijlswijk; Jaap A Wagenaar; Marc Bonten; Dick Heederik
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 4.  Monitoring of Farm-Level Antimicrobial Use to Guide Stewardship: Overview of Existing Systems and Analysis of Key Components and Processes.

Authors:  Pim Sanders; Wannes Vanderhaeghen; Mette Fertner; Klemens Fuchs; Walter Obritzhauser; Agnes Agunos; Carolee Carson; Birgitte Borck Høg; Vibe Dalhoff Andersen; Claire Chauvin; Anne Hémonic; Annemarie Käsbohrer; Roswitha Merle; Giovanni L Alborali; Federico Scali; Katharina D C Stärk; Cedric Muentener; Ingeborg van Geijlswijk; Fraser Broadfoot; Lucie Pokludová; Clair L Firth; Luís P Carmo; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Laura Jensen; Marie Sjölund; Jorge Pinto Ferreira; Stacey Brown; Dick Heederik; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-08-21

Review 5.  Comparison of different biomass methodologies to adjust sales data on veterinary antimicrobials in the USA.

Authors:  Ece Bulut; Renata Ivanek
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 5.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.