| Literature DB >> 28724922 |
Ewa Niemczura1, Stefan Hümmerich2,3, Fiorella Castelli4, Ernst Paunzen5, Klaus Bernhard2,3, Franz-Josef Hambsch2,3,6, Krzysztof Hełminiak7.
Abstract
HD 66051 is an eclipsing system with an orbital period of about 4.75 d that exhibits out-of-eclipse variability with the same period. New multicolour photometric observations confirm the longevity of the secondary variations, which we interpret as a signature of surface inhomogeneities on one of the components. Using archival and newly acquired high-resolution spectra, we have performed a detailed abundance analysis. The primary component is a slowly rotating late B-type star (T eff = 12500 ± 200 K; log g = 4.0, v sin i = 27 ± 2 km s-1) with a highly peculiar composition reminiscent of the singular HgMn-related star HD 65949, which seems to be its closest analogue. Some light elements as He, C, Mg, Al are depleted, while Si and P are enhanced. Except for Ni, all the iron-group elements, as well as most of the heavy elements, and in particular the REE elements, are overabundant. The secondary component was estimated to be a slowly rotating A-type star (T eff ~ 8000 K; log g = 4.0, v sin i ~ 18 km s-1). The unique configuration of HD 66051 opens up intriguing possibilities for future research, which might eventually and significantly contribute to the understanding of such diverse phenomena as atmospheric structure, mass transfer, magnetic fields, photometric variability and the origin of chemical anomalies observed in HgMn stars and related objects.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28724922 PMCID: PMC5517476 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05987-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Phase plots of HD 66051, based on our own photometric observations. The panels indicate, from top to bottom, B, V, and I data, respectively. Data have been binned (bin-size: 0.02 d). The secondary variability is clearly visible in all datasets.
Atmospheric parameters of HD 66051, as derived from different methods.
| Method | Result | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Strömgren |
| from |
|
| from [u − b] index | |
| Geneva photometry |
| for [M/H] = 0.0 dex |
|
| for [M/H] = 1.0 dex | |
| Hydrogen line profile fitting |
| from H |
|
|
|
|
The first three rows list parameters of the primary component, the bottom row (highlighted by italic font) indicates an estimate for the secondary star.
Figure 2Observed hydrogen Hα and Hβ lines (black lines) and best-fit synthetic profiles (green lines).
Chemical abundances (log N/Ntot) and standard deviations for individual elements.
| Element | Abundance | Solar abundance | Element | Abundance | Solar abundance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| He (2) | −2.50 ± 0.10 (5) | −1.11 | Zr (40) | −7.10 ± 0.25 (9) | −9.46 |
| C (6) | −4.52 ± 0.10 (4) | −3.61 | Nb (41) | −7.22 ± 0.30 (3) | −10.58 |
| O (8) | −3.71 ± 0.20 (5) | −3.35 | Mo (42) | −7.12 ± 0.20 (4) | −10.16 |
| Ne (10) | −3.80 ± 0.30 (8) | −4.11 | Ru (44) | −7.80 (1) | −10.29 |
| Mg (12) | −5.36 ± 0.20 (4) | −4.44 | Xe (54) | −5.07 ± 0.25 (3) | −9.80 |
| Al (13) | −7.07 ± 0.40 (6) | −5.59 | Ba (56) | −9.71 (1) | −9.86 |
| Si (14) | −3.55 ± 0.22 (28) | −4.53 | Ce (58) | −7.00 ± 0.40 (6) | −10.46 |
| P (15) | −5.40 ± 0.20 (8) | −6.63 | Pr (59) | −6.44 ± 0.28 (20) | −11.32 |
| S (16) | −4.76 ± 0.39 (7) | −4.92 | Nd (60) | −6.02 ± 0.30 (25) | −10.62 |
| Cl (17) | −4.74 ± 0.10 (5) | −6.54 | Sm (62) | −7.14 ± 0.38 (5) | −11.08 |
| Ar (18) | −5.24 ± 0.20 (5) | −5.64 | Eu (63) | −7.29 ± 0.40 (3) | −11.52 |
| Ca (20) | −5.25 ± 0.20 (6) | −5.70 | Gd (64) | −6.75 ± 0.18 (5) | −10.97 |
| Ti (22) | −5.44 ± 0.32 (20) | −7.09 | Tb (65) | −7.63 ± 0.20 (19) | −11.74 |
| V (23) | −7.00 ± 0.20 (3) | −8.11 | Dy (66) | −6.37 ± 0.38 (14) | −10.94 |
| Cr (24) | −5.35 ± 0.35 (26) | −6.40 | Ho (67) | −6.96 ± 0.30 (9) | −11.56 |
| Mn (25) | −5.70 ± 0.20 (16) | −6.61 | Er (68) | −7.18 ± 0.32 (11) | −11.12 |
| Fe (26) | −3.50 ± 0.20 (109) | −4.54 | Yb (70) | −7.00 ± 0.30 (4) | −10.20 |
| Co (27) | −5.60 ± 0.30 (3) | −7.05 | Lu (71) | −7.20 ± 0.20 (3) | −11.94 |
| Ni (28) | −6.20 ± 0.20 (10) | −5.82 | Hf (72) | −7.95 ± 0.28 (12) | −11.19 |
| Cu (29) | −5.73 ± 0.20 (4) | −7.85 | Pt (78) | −5.94 ± 0.30 (3) | −10.42 |
| Ga (31) | −6.50 ± 0.30 (3) | −9.00 | Au (79) | −7.03 (1) | −11.12 |
| Sr (38) | −6.20 ± 0.20 (4) | −9.17 | Hg (80) | −7.21 ± 0.20 (4) | −10.87 |
| Y (39) | −7.80 ± 0.30 (4) | −9.83 | Pb (82) | −6.79 (2) | −10.29 |
Number of individual lines and blends analysed is given in parentheses behind the abundance values. Solar abundances were taken from[38].
Figure 3Comparison of the chemical composition of HD 66051 (orange stars) to the solar abundance pattern (green circles). The elements overabundant in HD 66051 are indicated above the symbol, whereas the underabundant elements are indicated below.
Figure 4Comparison of the chemical composition of HD 66051 (red stars) to the abundance patterns observed in the HgMn stars HD 49606 (pink circles), HD 175640 (blue diamonds) [upper panel] and the HgMn-related, highly peculiar star HD 65949 (green diamonds) [lower panel]. Odd-Z elements and even-Z elements are denoted by, respectively, open and filled symbols.
Figure 5The Mg II region from 447.8 nm to 448.4 nm of the HARPS and HIDES spectra, indicating some of the lines identified in the primary star (red identifications) and the secondary component (black identifications). The observed spectra are shown in black, the synthetic spectra are indicated by the red line.