Literature DB >> 28724323

Evidence that disrupted orienting to evaluative social feedback undermines error correction in rejection sensitive women.

Jennifer A Mangels1,2, Olta Hoxha1, Sean P Lane3, Shoshana N Jarvis4, Geraldine Downey4.   

Abstract

For individuals high in Rejection Sensitivity (RS), a learned orientation to anxiously expect rejection from valued others, negative feedback from social sources may disrupt engagement with learning opportunities, impeding recovery from mistakes. One context in which this disruption may be particularly pronounced is among women high in RS following evaluation by a male in authority. To investigate this prediction, 40 college students (50% female) answered general knowledge questions followed by immediate performance feedback and the correct answer while we recorded event-related potentials. Error correction was measured with a subsequent surprise retest. Performance feedback was either nonsocial (asterisk/tone) or social (male professor's face/voice). Attention and learning were indexed respectively by the anterior frontal P3a (attentional orienting) and a set of negative-going waveforms over left inferior-posterior regions associated with successful encoding. For women, but not men, higher RS scores predicted poorer error correction in the social condition. A path analysis suggested that, for women, high RS disrupted attentional orienting to the social-evaluative performance feedback, which affected subsequent memory for the correct answer by reducing engagement with learning opportunities. These results suggest a mechanism for how social feedback may impede learning among women who are high in RS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; FRN; LERN; P3a; memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28724323      PMCID: PMC6154388          DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1358210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Neurosci        ISSN: 1747-0919            Impact factor:   2.083


  49 in total

1.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.

Authors:  Patrick E Shrout; Niall Bolger
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships.

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Geraldine Downey; Kathy Berenson; Ozlem Ayduk; N Jan Kang
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2010-02

3.  Paying to belong: when does rejection trigger ingratiation?

Authors:  Rainer Romero-Canyas; Geraldine Downey; Kavita S Reddy; Sylvia Rodriguez; Timothy J Cavanaugh; Rosemary Pelayo
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-11

Review 4.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

Authors:  B Butterfield; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't).

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males.

Authors:  M Inzlicht; T Ben-Zeev
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

8.  Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues.

Authors:  Kathy R Berenson; Anett Gyurak; Ozlem Ayduk; Geraldine Downey; Matthew J Garner; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2009-12-01

9.  Does rejection hurt? An FMRI study of social exclusion.

Authors:  Naomi I Eisenberger; Matthew D Lieberman; Kipling D Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man.

Authors:  R T Knight
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Neural correlates of negative expectancy and impaired social feedback processing in social anxiety.

Authors:  Ruolei Gu; Xiang Ao; Licheng Mo; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.