OBJECTIVES: Determine whether the peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio correlates with the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in burned children with smoke inhalation injury, with the goal of understanding if the peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio can serve as a surrogate for the PaO2/FIO2 ratio for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Shriners Hospitals for Children-Galveston. PATIENTS: All burned children with smoke inhalation injury who were admitted from 1996 to 2014 and had simultaneously obtained peripheral capillary oxygenation, FIO2 and PaO2 measurements. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients (63% male, 8 ± 5 yr, 53% ± 24% total body surface area burns) were analyzed. Peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratios were divided into four subgroups based on peripheral capillary oxygenation values (≤ 100%, ≤ 98%, ≤ 95%, and ≤ 92%). Significance was accepted at r greater than 0.81. The r (number of matches) was 0.66 (23,072) for less than or equal to 100%, 0.87 (18,932) for less than or equal to 98%, 0.89 (7,056) for less than or equal to 95%, and 0.93 (4,229) for less than or equal to 92%. In the subgroup of patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, r was 0.65 (8,357) for less than or equal to 100%, 0.89 (7,578) for less than or equal to 98%, 0.89 (4,115) for less than or equal to 95%, and 0.91 (2,288) less than or equal to 92%. CONCLUSIONS: PaO2/FIO2 and peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 strongly correlate in burned children with smoke inhalation injury, with a peripheral capillary oxygenation of less than 92% providing the strongest correlation. Thus, peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio may be able to serve as surrogate for PaO2/FIO2, especially when titrating FIO2 to achieve a peripheral capillary oxygenation of 90-95% (i.e., in the acute respiratory distress syndrome range).
OBJECTIVES: Determine whether the peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio correlates with the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in burned children with smoke inhalation injury, with the goal of understanding if the peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio can serve as a surrogate for the PaO2/FIO2 ratio for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Shriners Hospitals for Children-Galveston. PATIENTS: All burned children with smoke inhalation injury who were admitted from 1996 to 2014 and had simultaneously obtained peripheral capillary oxygenation, FIO2 and PaO2 measurements. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-three patients (63% male, 8 ± 5 yr, 53% ± 24% total body surface area burns) were analyzed. Peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratios were divided into four subgroups based on peripheral capillary oxygenation values (≤ 100%, ≤ 98%, ≤ 95%, and ≤ 92%). Significance was accepted at r greater than 0.81. The r (number of matches) was 0.66 (23,072) for less than or equal to 100%, 0.87 (18,932) for less than or equal to 98%, 0.89 (7,056) for less than or equal to 95%, and 0.93 (4,229) for less than or equal to 92%. In the subgroup of patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, r was 0.65 (8,357) for less than or equal to 100%, 0.89 (7,578) for less than or equal to 98%, 0.89 (4,115) for less than or equal to 95%, and 0.91 (2,288) less than or equal to 92%. CONCLUSIONS:PaO2/FIO2 and peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 strongly correlate in burned children with smoke inhalation injury, with a peripheral capillary oxygenation of less than 92% providing the strongest correlation. Thus, peripheral capillary oxygenation/FIO2 ratio may be able to serve as surrogate for PaO2/FIO2, especially when titrating FIO2 to achieve a peripheral capillary oxygenation of 90-95% (i.e., in the acute respiratory distress syndrome range).
Authors: G R Bernard; A Artigas; K L Brigham; J Carlet; K Falke; L Hudson; M Lamy; J R Legall; A Morris; R Spragg Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Christian Smolle; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Abigail A Forbes; Paul Wurzer; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Ludwik K Branski; Fredrik Huss; Lars-Peter Kamolz Journal: Burns Date: 2016-09-03 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Robert E Barrow; Rene Przkora; Hal K Hawkins; Laura N Barrow; Marc G Jeschke; David N Herndon Journal: Shock Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ellen Caldwell; Eve Peabody; Jim Weaver; Diane P Martin; Margaret Neff; Eric J Stern; Leonard D Hudson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary A King; Michelle M Garrison; Monica S Vavilala; Jerry J Zimmerman; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272