Jennifer Wang1, John Ha2, Aristeo Lopez3, Taft Bhuket4, Benny Liu4, Robert J Wong4. 1. Department of Medicine, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Medicine, Highland Hospital, Oakland, California. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Alameda Health System-Highland Hospital, Oakland, CA.
Abstract
GOALS: To evaluate the impact of insurance status on tumor stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and overall survival among adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Insurance status affects access to care, which impacts timely access to cancer screening for early detection and treatment. STUDY: Using the 2007 to 2012 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively evaluated US adults with HCC. Insurance status included Medicare/commercial insurance (MC), Medicaid (MA), and no insurance (NI). HCC tumor stage was evaluated using SEER staging system and Milan criteria. HCC treatment and survival were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 32,388 HCC patients (71.2% MC, 23.9% MA, and 4.9% NI), patients with MA or NI were significantly less likely to have localized tumor stage at time of diagnosis compared with MC [NI vs. MC; odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.92; P<0.001]. MA and NI patients were less likely to receive treatment, and specifically less likely to receive surgical resection or liver transplantation compared with MC patients, even after correcting for tumor stage at diagnosis (odds of surgical resection or liver transplant in NI vs. MC: odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.21-0.33; P<0.001). NI patients (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50; P<0.001) had significantly lower survival compared with MC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults with HCC, MA, or NI patients had more advanced tumor stage at diagnosis, lower rates treatment, and significantly lower overall survival. Ensuring equal insurance coverage may improve access to care and mitigate some disparities in HCC outcomes.
GOALS: To evaluate the impact of insurance status on tumor stage at diagnosis, treatment received, and overall survival among adults with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND: Insurance status affects access to care, which impacts timely access to cancer screening for early detection and treatment. STUDY: Using the 2007 to 2012 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we retrospectively evaluated US adults with HCC. Insurance status included Medicare/commercial insurance (MC), Medicaid (MA), and no insurance (NI). HCC tumor stage was evaluated using SEER staging system and Milan criteria. HCC treatment and survival were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 32,388 HCC patients (71.2% MC, 23.9% MA, and 4.9% NI), patients with MA or NI were significantly less likely to have localized tumor stage at time of diagnosis compared with MC [NI vs. MC; odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.92; P<0.001]. MA and NI patients were less likely to receive treatment, and specifically less likely to receive surgical resection or liver transplantation compared with MCpatients, even after correcting for tumor stage at diagnosis (odds of surgical resection or liver transplant in NI vs. MC: odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.21-0.33; P<0.001). NI patients (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.29-1.50; P<0.001) had significantly lower survival compared with MCpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults with HCC, MA, or NI patients had more advanced tumor stage at diagnosis, lower rates treatment, and significantly lower overall survival. Ensuring equal insurance coverage may improve access to care and mitigate some disparities in HCC outcomes.
Authors: Grace C Lee; Cristina R Ferrone; Parsia A Vagefi; Raul N Uppot; Kenneth K Tanabe; Keith D Lillemoe; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Motaz Qadan Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Shoshana Adler Jaffe; Orrin Myers; Angela L W Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Deirdre A Hill; Jean A McDougall Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Joshua P Kronenfeld; Emily L Ryon; David Goldberg; Rachel M Lee; Adam Yopp; Annie Wang; Ann Y Lee; Sommer Luu; Cary Hsu; Eric Silberfein; Maria C Russell; Nipun B Merchant; Neha Goel Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Aman Opneja; Gino Cioffi; Asrar Alahmadi; Nelroy Jones; Tin-Yun Tang; Nirav Patil; David L Bajor; Joel N Saltzman; Amr Mohamed; Eva Selfridge; Ankit Mangla; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Richard T Lee Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.711