Matthew L Durie1, Jai N Darvall2, Daniel A Hadley3, Mark A Tacey4. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: matthew.durie@mh.org.au. 2. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: jai.darvall@mh.org.au. 3. Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 4. Melbourne EpiCentre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of a system of expedited review of critically ill patients in the Emergency Department (ED) on ED length of stay (LOS) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital comparing two 12-month periods before and after implementation of a 'Code ICU' system of expedited review of critically ill patients in the ED. All adult ED to ICU admissions were included. Separate analyses were performed for patients intubated prior to ICU admission. RESULTS: 622 and 629 patients were included in each time period. During the intervention period more patients had ED LOS<240min in both the total [199 (32.0%) vs. 243 (38.6%), P=0.014; adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.25] and intubated cohorts [145 (51.2%) vs. 172 (61.9%), P=0.011; adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.36]. 'Code ICU' intubated patients had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS compared to non-'Code ICU' intubated patients. CONCLUSIONS: A system of rapid review of critically ill patients in the ED was associated with reduced ED LOS and improved ICU outcomes.
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of a system of expedited review of critically illpatients in the Emergency Department (ED) on ED length of stay (LOS) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital comparing two 12-month periods before and after implementation of a 'Code ICU' system of expedited review of critically illpatients in the ED. All adult ED to ICU admissions were included. Separate analyses were performed for patients intubated prior to ICU admission. RESULTS: 622 and 629 patients were included in each time period. During the intervention period more patients had ED LOS<240min in both the total [199 (32.0%) vs. 243 (38.6%), P=0.014; adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.25] and intubated cohorts [145 (51.2%) vs. 172 (61.9%), P=0.011; adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.36]. 'Code ICU' intubated patients had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS compared to non-'Code ICU' intubated patients. CONCLUSIONS: A system of rapid review of critically illpatients in the ED was associated with reduced ED LOS and improved ICU outcomes.