Literature DB >> 28722299

Cost and Health Care Utilization Implications of Bariatric Surgery Versus Intensive Lifestyle and Medical Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes.

Souvik Banerjee1, Louis P Garrison2, David R Flum3, David E Arterburn4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost and health care utilization of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) randomized into either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery or an intensive lifestyle and medical intervention (ILMI).
METHODS: This analysis (N = 745) is based on 2-year follow-up of a small randomized controlled trial (RCT); adult patients with obesity and T2DM were recruited between 2011 and 2012 from Kaiser Permanente Washington. Comparisons were made for patients randomized into either RYGB (N = 15) or ILMI (N = 17).
RESULTS: There were no significant cost savings for RYGB versus ILMI patients through the follow-up years. Pharmacy cost was lower for RYGB versus ILMI patients by about $900 in year 2 versus year 0; however, inpatient and emergency room costs were higher for surgery patients in follow-up years relative to year 0. Median total cost for nonrandomized patients was higher in year 0 and in year 2 compared to randomized patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery is not cost saving in the short term. Moreover, the costs of patients who enter into RCTs of RYGB may differ from the costs of those who do not enter RCTs, suggesting use of caution when using such data to draw inferences about the general population with obesity.
© 2017 The Obesity Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28722299      PMCID: PMC5769931          DOI: 10.1002/oby.21927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  27 in total

1.  Yield of opportunistic targeted screening for type 2 diabetes in primary care: the diabscreen study.

Authors:  Erwin P Klein Woolthuis; Wim J C de Grauw; Willem H E M van Gerwen; Henk J M van den Hoogen; Eloy H van de Lisdonk; Job F M Metsemakers; Chris van Weel
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Health expenditures among high-risk patients after gastric bypass and matched controls.

Authors:  Matthew L Maciejewski; Edward H Livingston; Valerie A Smith; Leila C Kahwati; William G Henderson; David E Arterburn
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-07

4.  Patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials do not represent the inflammatory bowel disease patient population.

Authors:  Christina Ha; Thomas A Ullman; Corey A Siegel; Asher Kornbluth
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Effects of bariatric surgery on disability pension in Swedish obese subjects.

Authors:  L Gripeteg; A K Lindroos; M Peltonen; L Sjöström; K Narbro
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Financial implications of coverage for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Eric A Finkelstein; Benjamin T Allaire; Somali M Burgess; Brent C Hale
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Sick leave and disability pension before and after treatment for obesity: a report from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study.

Authors:  K Narbro; G Agren; E Jonsson; B Larsson; I Näslund; H Wedel; L Sjöström
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1999-06

8.  Impact of bariatric surgery on health care costs of obese persons: a 6-year follow-up of surgical and comparison cohorts using health plan data.

Authors:  Jonathan P Weiner; Suzanne M Goodwin; Hsien-Yen Chang; Shari D Bolen; Thomas M Richards; Roger A Johns; Soyal R Momin; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  A population-based, shared decision-making approach to recruit for a randomized trial of bariatric surgery versus lifestyle for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  David Arterburn; David R Flum; Emily O Westbrook; Sharon Fuller; Mary Shea; Steven N Bock; Jeffrey Landers; Katie Kowalski; Emily Turnbull; David E Cummings
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.734

10.  A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Cremieux; Henry Buchwald; Scott A Shikora; Arindam Ghosh; Haixia Elaine Yang; Marric Buessing
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Economics and Policy in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Hoerger
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  The Effect of Metabolic Surgery on the Complications of Diabetes: What Are the Unanswered Questions?

Authors:  Karl J Neff; Carel W Le Roux
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.555

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.