Said A Al-Busafi1, Heba Omar2. 1. Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. 2. Department of Endemic Medicine and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.
Sir,It is with great interest that we read the Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation (SASLT) position statement[1] and guidelines[2] on direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The position statement and the guidelines, which were clearly influenced by the limited availability of highly priced DAAs, recommend that HCV treatment should be prioritized to patients at higher risk for developing HCV-related complications.The introduction of the curative DAAs to the global market caused worldwide celebration because it is expected to save millions of lives and control if not eliminate one of the major infectious disease worldwide.[3] Unfortunately, for the majority of HCVpatients, these costly medications are not readily available, accessible, or affordable even for those in the developed countries.[3] This is likely going to affect many countries in their ability to minimize the burden of this disease.[4]On the other hand, generic DAAs (sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and daclatasvir) are being produced in India and other countries with permission of the concerned pharmaceutical agencies and priced less than 1% of their current actual price in USA and Europe. The evidence for the clinical safety and efficacy of these generics is compelling including the recent interim results from international REDEMPTION trial presented by Freeman et al.[5] The results of this trial, which was supported by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), are important in indicating that generic DAAs are highly effective and safe comparable to those reported in clinical trials of branded DAAs. Another abstract presented by Hill et al. at the same meeting showed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient for the combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir was approximately $200 for 12 weeks' course of treatment per patient.[6]Oman, with an estimated HCV prevalence of 1%, is one such country where access to those important agents is also limited.[7] This has led many of our patients to self-import these drugs from India giving them hope instead of waiting for years to be treated from this debilitating disease.At the Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, using the EASL 2016 guidelines,[8] we have treated 58 HCVpatients [28% genotype 3, 26% cirrhotic with 40% of them decompensated, and 3% severe chronic kidney disease (CKD)] with generic DAAs including (sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and daclatasvir). Sustained virological response was achieved in 57 patients (98%), the remaining one patient with severe CKD discontinued treatment due to worsening renal function. All patients with decompensated cirrhosis were delisted from transplantation.Therefore, healthcare leaders and policy makers at the national and international level should adopt strategies to ensure that these DAAs are made available and are accessible and affordable for all in need.
Authors: Abdullah S Alghamdi; Adel Alqutub; Faisal Abaalkhail; Faisal M Sanai; Hamdan Alghamdi; Ibrahim Altraif; Khalid A Alswat; Mohammed Y Alghamdi; Mohammed A Babatin; Faleh Z Alfaleh Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.485
Authors: Abdullah S Alghamdi; Mohammed Alghamdi; Faisal M Sanai; Hamdan Alghamdi; Faisal Aba-Alkhail; Khalid Alswat; Mohammed Babatin; Adel Alqutub; Ibrahim Altraif; Faleh Alfaleh Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 2.485
Authors: Danny J Edwards; Delphi Gm Coppens; Tara L Prasad; Laurien A Rook; Jayasree K Iyer Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 9.408