| Literature DB >> 28721928 |
Giovanni B Frisoni1, Marina Boccardi2, Frederik Barkhof3, Kaj Blennow4, Stefano Cappa5, Konstantinos Chiotis6, Jean-Francois Démonet7, Valentina Garibotto8, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos9, Anton Gietl10, Oskar Hansson11, Karl Herholz12, Clifford R Jack13, Flavio Nobili14, Agneta Nordberg15, Heather M Snyder16, Mara Ten Kate17, Andrea Varrone18, Emiliano Albanese9, Stefanie Becker19, Patrick Bossuyt20, Maria C Carrillo16, Chiara Cerami21, Bruno Dubois22, Valentina Gallo23, Ezio Giacobini24, Gabriel Gold25, Samia Hurst26, Anders Lönneborg27, Karl-Olof Lovblad28, Niklas Mattsson29, José-Luis Molinuevo30, Andreas U Monsch31, Urs Mosimann32, Alessandro Padovani33, Agnese Picco34, Corinna Porteri35, Osman Ratib36, Laure Saint-Aubert6, Charles Scerri37, Philip Scheltens17, Jonathan M Schott38, Ida Sonni39, Stefan Teipel40, Paolo Vineis41, Pieter Jelle Visser42, Yutaka Yasui43, Bengt Winblad44.
Abstract
The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease can be improved by the use of biological measures. Biomarkers of functional impairment, neuronal loss, and protein deposition that can be assessed by neuroimaging (ie, MRI and PET) or CSF analysis are increasingly being used to diagnose Alzheimer's disease in research studies and specialist clinical settings. However, the validation of the clinical usefulness of these biomarkers is incomplete, and that is hampering reimbursement for these tests by health insurance providers, their widespread clinical implementation, and improvements in quality of health care. We have developed a strategic five-phase roadmap to foster the clinical validation of biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease, adapted from the approach for cancer biomarkers. Sufficient evidence of analytical validity (phase 1 of a structured framework adapted from oncology) is available for all biomarkers, but their clinical validity (phases 2 and 3) and clinical utility (phases 4 and 5) are incomplete. To complete these phases, research priorities include the standardisation of the readout of these assays and thresholds for normality, the evaluation of their performance in detecting early disease, the development of diagnostic algorithms comprising combinations of biomarkers, and the development of clinical guidelines for the use of biomarkers in qualified memory clinics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28721928 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30159-X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Neurol ISSN: 1474-4422 Impact factor: 44.182