Literature DB >> 28721899

Gaps in Radiation Therapy Awareness: Results From an Educational Multi-institutional Survey of US Internal Medicine Residents.

Narek Shaverdian1, Sun Mi Yoo2, Ryan Cook3, Eric M Chang1, Naomi Jiang1, Ye Yuan1, Kiri Sandler1, Michael Steinberg1, Percy Lee4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Internists and primary care providers play a growing role in cancer care. We therefore evaluated the awareness of radiation therapy in general and specifically the clinical utility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among current US internal medicine residents. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A web-based institutional review board-approved multi-institutional survey was distributed to US internal medicine residency programs. The survey evaluated trainee demographic characteristics, baseline radiation oncology awareness, knowledge of the role of SBRT for early-stage NSCLC, and whether the survey successfully improved awareness.
RESULTS: Thirty US internal medicine programs participated, with an overall participant response rate of 46% (1177 of 2551). Of the trainees, 93% (n=1076) reported no radiation oncology education in their residency, 39% (n=452) reported confidence in knowing when to consult radiation oncology in an oncologic emergency, and 26% (n=293) reported confidence in knowing when to consult radiation oncology in the setting of a newly diagnosed cancer. Of the participants, 76% (n=850) correctly identified that surgical resection is the standard treatment in operable early-stage NSCLC, but only 50% (n=559) of participants would recommend SBRT to a medically inoperable patient, followed by 31% of participants (n=347) who were unsure of the most appropriate treatment, and 10% (n=117) who recommended waiting to offer palliative therapy. Ninety percent of participants (n=1029) agreed that they would benefit from further training on when to consult radiation oncology. Overall, 96% (n=1072) indicated that the survey increased their knowledge and awareness of the role of SBRT.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participating trainees received no education in radiation oncology in their residency, reported a lack of confidence regarding when to consult radiation oncology, and overwhelmingly agreed that they would benefit from further training. These findings should serve as a call to increase the educational collaboration between internal medicine and radiation oncology departments to ensure optimal cancer care.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721899     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

1.  An interactive contouring module improves engagement and interest in radiation oncology among preclinical medical students: Results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Pushpa Neppala; Michael V Sherer; Grant Larson; Alex K Bryant; Neil Panjwani; James D Murphy; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-12

2.  A Framework for Sharing Radiation Dose Distribution Maps in the Electronic Medical Record for Improving Multidisciplinary Patient Management.

Authors:  Ricky R Savjani; Noriko Salamon; Jie Deng; Martin Ma; Steve Tenn; Nzhde Agazaryan; John Hegde; Tania Kaprealian
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-03-12

3.  Oncology Curricula in Postgraduate General Dentistry Programs: a Survey of Residency Program Directors.

Authors:  Evan B Rosen; Alexander Drew; Joseph M Huryn
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Demystifying radiation oncology clinical trial concerns for protocol scientific review and institutional review board committee members.

Authors:  Jamiluddin Qazi; Kristi A DeHaai; Benjamin M Hawkins; Kara D Romano; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Ronald C Chen; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-03-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.