Literature DB >> 28721620

Methane biofiltration in the presence of ethanol vapor under steady and transient state conditions: an experimental study.

Milad Ferdowsi1, Antonio Avalos Ramirez1,2, Joseph Peter Jones1, Michèle Heitz3.   

Abstract

Methane (CH4) removal in the presence of ethanol vapors was performed by a stone-based bed and a hybrid packing biofilter in parallel. In the absence of ethanol, a methane removal efficiency of 55 ± 1% was obtained for both biofilters under similar CH4 inlet load (IL) of 13 ± 0.5 gCH4 m-3 h-1 and an empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 6 min. The results proved the key role of the bottom section in both biofilters for simultaneous removal of CH4 and ethanol. Ethanol vapor was completely eliminated in the bottom sections for an ethanol IL variation between 1 and 11 gethanol m-3 h-1. Ethanol absorption and accumulation in the biofilm phase as well as ethanol conversion to CO2 contributed to ethanol removal efficiency of 100%. In the presence of ethanol vapor, CO2 productions in the bottom section increased almost fourfold in both biofilters. The ethanol concentration in the leachate of the biofilter exceeding 2200 gethanol m-3leachate in both biofilters demonstrated the excess accumulation of ethanol in the biofilm phase. The biofilters responded quickly to an ethanol shock load followed by a starvation with 20% decrease of their performance. The return to normal operations in both biofilters after the transient conditions took less than 5 days. Unlike the hybrid packing biofilter, excess pressure drop (up to 1.9 cmH2O m-1) was an important concern for the stone bed biofilter. The biomass accumulation in the bottom section of the stone bed biofilter contributed to 80% of the total pressure drop. However, the 14-day starvation reduced the pressure drop to 0.25 cmH2O m-1.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofiltration; Ethanol; Hybrid biofilter; Methane; Packing material; Transient state

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28721620     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9634-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  20 in total

1.  Analysis and comparison of biotreatment of air polluted with ethanol using biofiltration and biotrickling filtration.

Authors:  Karine Morotti; Antonio Avalos Ramirez; J Peter Jones; Michèle Heitz
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.247

2.  Identifying the limitations of conventional biofiltration of diffuse methane emissions at long-term operation.

Authors:  S Gómez-Cuervo; J Hernández; F Omil
Journal:  Environ Technol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.247

3.  Role of biological activity and biomass distribution in air biofilter performance.

Authors:  Daekeun Kim; George A Sorial
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Transient-state studies and neural modeling of the removal of a gas-phase pollutant mixture in a biotrickling filter.

Authors:  M Estefanía López; Zvi Boger; Eldon R Rene; María C Veiga; Christian Kennes
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  A comparative study of fungal and bacterial biofiltration treating a VOC mixture.

Authors:  José M Estrada; Sergio Hernández; Raúl Muñoz; Sergio Revah
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 10.588

Review 6.  Biomass accumulation and control strategies in gas biofiltration.

Authors:  Chunping Yang; Hong Chen; Guangming Zeng; Guanlong Yu; Shenglian Luo
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 14.227

7.  Effects of nonmethane volatile organic compounds on microbial community of methanotrophic biofilter.

Authors:  Tae Gwan Kim; Eun-Hee Lee; Kyung-Suk Cho
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Performance and macrokinetic analysis of biofiltration of toluene and p-xylene mixtures in a conventional biofilter packed with inert material.

Authors:  G Gallastegui; A Avalos Ramirez; A Elías; J P Jones; M Heitz
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Organic acids and ethanol inhibit the oxidation of methane by mire methanotrophs.

Authors:  Adam S Wieczorek; Harold L Drake; Steffen Kolb
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Coal-packed methane biofilter for mitigation of green house gas emissions from coal mine ventilation air.

Authors:  Hendy Limbri; Cindy Gunawan; Torsten Thomas; Andrew Smith; Jason Scott; Bettina Rosche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.