Literature DB >> 28720514

AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 2: defining complexity, formulating scope, and questions.

Michael P Kelly1, Jane Noyes2, Robert L Kane3, Christine Chang4, Stacey Uhl5, Karen A Robinson6, Stacey Springs7, Mary E Butler8, Jeanne-Marie Guise9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Complex interventions; Evidence-based medicine; Qualitative research; Research design; Review literature as topic; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28720514     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  17 in total

Review 1.  Metabolomics, physical activity, exercise and health: A review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Rachel S Kelly; Michael P Kelly; Paul Kelly
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 5.187

2.  Conceptualizing clinical decision support as complex interventions: a meta-analysis of comparative effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Thomas J Reese; Siru Liu; Bryan Steitz; Allison McCoy; Elise Russo; Brian Koh; Jessica Ancker; Adam Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

Review 3.  Pharmacist-Led Self-management Interventions to Improve Diabetes Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linda van Eikenhorst; Katja Taxis; Liset van Dijk; Han de Gier
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Application of the intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews within a Cochrane review: an illustrative case study.

Authors:  Cathal A Cadogan; Audrey Rankin; Simon Lewin; Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  Taking account of context in systematic reviews and guidelines considering a complexity perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Booth; Graham Moore; Kate Flemming; Ruth Garside; Nigel Rollins; Özge Tunçalp; Jane Noyes
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 6.  Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods.

Authors:  Kate Flemming; Andrew Booth; Ruth Garside; Özge Tunçalp; Jane Noyes
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

7.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Complex Interventions to Meet the Needs of VA Stakeholders: Experience of the Department of Veterans Affairs Evidence Synthesis Program.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Nancy Greer; Wei Duan-Porter
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Formulating questions to explore complex interventions within qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Andrew Booth; Jane Noyes; Kate Flemming; Graham Moore; Özge Tunçalp; Elham Shakibazadeh
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

9.  Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods.

Authors:  Jane Noyes; Andrew Booth; Graham Moore; Kate Flemming; Özge Tunçalp; Elham Shakibazadeh
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

10.  Proposed pathway for patients undergoing enhanced recovery after spinal surgery: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Licina; Andrew Silvers; Harry Laughlin; Jeremy Russell; Crispin Wan
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.