| Literature DB >> 28720514 |
Michael P Kelly1, Jane Noyes2, Robert L Kane3, Christine Chang4, Stacey Uhl5, Karen A Robinson6, Stacey Springs7, Mary E Butler8, Jeanne-Marie Guise9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The early stages of a systematic review set the scope and expectations. This can be particularly challenging for complex interventions given their multidimensional and dynamic nature. RATIONALE: This paper builds on concepts introduced in paper 1 of this series. It describes the methodological, practical, and philosophical challenges and potential approaches for formulating the questions and scope of systematic reviews of complex interventions. Furthermore, it discusses the use of theory to help organize reviews of complex interventions. DISCUSSION: Many interventions in medicine, public health, education, social services, behavioral health, and community programs are complex, and they may not fit neatly within the established paradigm for reviews of straightforward interventions. This paper provides conceptual and operational guidance for these early stages of scope formulation to assist authors of systematic reviews of complex interventions.Keywords: Complex interventions; Evidence-based medicine; Qualitative research; Research design; Review literature as topic; Systematic review
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28720514 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Epidemiol ISSN: 0895-4356 Impact factor: 6.437