Literature DB >> 28720415

Assessment of Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement With Multiphasic Computed Tomography Using a Faster Injection Rate, Late Arterial Phase, and Weight-Based Contrast Dosing.

Kathleen Eddy1, Andreu F Costa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to update our liver computed tomography (CT) protocol according to published guidelines, and to quantitatively evaluate the effect of these modifications.
METHODS: The modified liver CT protocol employed a faster injection rate (5 vs 3 mL/s), later arterial phase (20-second vs 10-second postbolus trigger), and weight-based dosing of iodinated contrast (1.7 mL/kg vs 100 mL fixed dose). Liver and vascular attenuation values were measured on CTs of patients with cirrhosis from January to September 2015 (old protocol, n = 49) and from October to December 2015 (modified protocol, n = 31). CTs were considered adequate if liver enhancement exceeded 50 Hounsfield units (HU) in portal venous phase, or when the unenhanced phase was unavailable, if a minimum iodine concentration of 500 mg I/kg was achieved. Attenuations and iodine concentrations were compared using the t test and the number of suboptimal studies was compared with Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: CTs acquired with the modified protocol demonstrated higher aortic (P = .001) and portal vein (P < .0001) attenuations in the arterial phase as well as greater hepatic attenuation on all postcontrast phases (P = .0006, .002, and .003 for arterial, venous, and equilibrium phases, respectively). Hepatic enhancement in the portal venous phase (61 ± 15 HU vs 51 ± 16 HU; P = .0282) and iodine concentrations (595 ± 88 mg I/kg vs 456 ± 112 mg I/kg; P < .0001) were improved, and the number of suboptimal studies was reduced from 57% to 23% (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: A liver CT protocol with later arterial phase, faster injection rate, and weight-based dosing of intravenous contrast significantly improves liver enhancement and iodine concentrations in patients with cirrhosis, resulting in significantly fewer suboptimal studies.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Association of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cirrhosis; Iodinated contrast media; Liver imaging; Multidetector computed tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28720415     DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).

Authors:  Yeun-Yoon Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Claude B Sirlin; Chansik An; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Investigation of the Utility and Safety of Dynamic Computed Tomography with Vasodilators.

Authors:  Jun Watanabe; Kanenori Endo; Yasutaka Tanaka; Keisuke Goto; Shoichi Urushibara; Tomohiro Osaki; Shigeru Tatebe; Seiichi Nakamura; Yasuaki Hirooka; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 1.641

3.  An Individualized Contrast-Enhanced Liver Computed Tomography Imaging Protocol Based on Body Mass Index in 126 Patients Seen for Liver Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jian Jiang; Maowei Zhang; Yuan Ji; Chunfeng Li; Xin Fang; Shuyuan Zhang; Wei Wang; Lijun Wang; Ailian Liu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.