Literature DB >> 28720366

The Evolving Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Treatment of Urolithiasis.

Francesco Sanguedolce1, Giorgio Bozzini2, Ben Chew3, Panagiotis Kallidonis4, Jean de la Rosette5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Retrograde intrarenal surgery has gained substantial popularity worldwide thanks to continuous improvements in technology and techniques, and is now considered one of the first-line treatment options for active removal of renal stones.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive synthesis of the main evidences in literature on the current management of kidney stones by means of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of literature has been conducted using search string "retrograde intrarenal surgery OR flexible ureteroscop* OR ureterorenoscop*", without any language restriction; PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2016. Exclusion criteria involved manuscripts dealing with paediatric patients, and RIRS for proximal ureteric stones and for upper tract urothelial tumours. Fifty-seven papers were finally included in the analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Technological progress focuses on the miniaturisation of disposables and scopes, as well as on the increase of durability and improvement of the quality of image provided by these instruments. The technique has been in continuous development following the progress in technology. Currently, the main target of RIRS are renal stones 1-2cm in size, even though tertiary centres are pushing the boundaries to the treatment of larger stones. Nomograms predicting surgical outcomes and improving preoperative surgical planning have been developed. RIRS has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with specific conditions such as bleeding diathesis, anatomical malformation, or pregnancy. Cost effectiveness of the approach is still a matter of controversy when compared with other treatment modalities.
CONCLUSIONS: RIRS is a well-established procedure under constant evolution with advances in technique and technology. It has gained worldwide popularity due to its minimal invasiveness and satisfactory outcomes. Future developments are needed to increase its cost effectiveness and extend its use to a wider range of indications. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this collaborative review, we have summarised the best evidence in literature with respect to current management of renal stones by means of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with flexible ureteroscopy. RIRS has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment modality in a wide spectrum of clinical scenarios; technology and technique are continuously evolving to further push boundaries of its indications and efficacy.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal stones; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28720366     DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Focus        ISSN: 2405-4569


  8 in total

1.  [Application of machine learning models in predicting early stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones].

Authors:  X H Zhu; M Y Yang; H Z Xia; W He; Z Y Zhang; Y Q Liu; C L Xiao; L L Ma; J Lu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Effectiveness and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of isolated kidney stones.

Authors:  Yuanqi Cheng; Ruoshan Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Maged Kamal Fayad; Omar Fahmy; Khaled Mukhtar Abulazayem; Nashaat M Salama
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Prediction of stone-free status after single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones.

Authors:  Şenol Tonyalı; Mehmet Yılmaz; Mustafa Karaaslan; Cavit Ceylan; Levent Işıkay
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-11

6.  Disposable versus Reusable Ureteroscopes: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Comparison.

Authors:  Giorgio Bozzini; Beatrice Filippi; Sulieman Alriyalat; Alberto Calori; Umberto Besana; Alexander Mueller; Dmitri Pushkar; Javier Romero-Otero; Antonio Pastore; Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Salvatore Micali; Carlo Buizza; Bernardo Rocco
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-02-10

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Surgery: Results of Our Large Patient Series.

Authors:  Kadir Karkin; Ergün Alma; Ediz Vuruşkan; Güçlü Gürlen; Umut Ünal; Hakan Erçil; Zafer Gökhan Gürbüz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-18

8.  Effect of ureteral calculus in outpatients receiving semirigid ureteroscope laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Chen-Pang Hou; Yu-Hsiang Lin; Horng-Heng Juang; Phei-Lang Chang; Chien-Lun Chen; Pei-Shan Yang; Chen-Che Lee; Ke-Hung Tsui
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.