Literature DB >> 28719921

[Patient's Autonomy and Information in Psycho-Oncology: Computer Based Distress Screening for an Interactive Treatment Planning (ePOS-react)].

Norbert Schäffeler1,2, Jana Sedelmaier1, Hannah Möhrer1, Katrin Ziser1, Johanna Ringwald1,2, Martin Wickert2, Sara Brucker3, Florian Junne1, Stephan Zipfel1,2, Martin Teufel1,4.   

Abstract

To identify distressed patients in oncology using screening questionnaires is quite challenging in clinical routine. Up to now there is no evidence based recommendation which instrument is most suitable and how to put a screening to practice. Using computer based screening tools offers the possibility to automatically analyse patient's data, inform psycho-oncological and medical staff about the results, and use reactive questionnaires. Studies on how to empower patients in decision making in psycho-oncology are rare.Methods Women with breast and gynaecological cancer have been consecutively included in this study (n=103) at time of inpatient surgical treatment in a gynaecological clinic. They answered the computer based screening questionnaire (ePOS-react) for routine distress screening at time of admission. At the end of the tool an individual recommendation concerning psycho-oncological treatment is given ( i) psycho-oncological counselling, ii) brief psycho-oncological contact, iii) no treatment suggestion). The informed patients could choose autonomously either the recommended treatment or an individually more favoured alternative possibility. Additionally, a clinical interview (approx. 30 min) based on the "Psychoonkologische Basisdiagnostik (PO-Bado)" has been carried out for a third-party assessment of patients' need for treatment.Results 68.9% followed the treatment recommendation. 22.3% asked for a more "intense" (e. g. counselling instead of recommended brief contact) and 8,7% for a "less intense" intervention than recommended. The accordance of third-party assessment (clinical interview "PO-Bado") and treatment recommendation is about 72.8%. The accordance of third-party assessment and patient's choice (ePOS-react) is about 58.3%. The latter is smaller because 29.1% asked for a brief psycho-oncological contact for whom from the third-party assessment's perspective no indication for treatment has been existent.Discussion A direct response of the screening result (treatment recommendation) during the computer based screening and asking for a patient's choice leads to an increase of brief psycho-oncological contacts for personal information about psycho-oncological interventions. Compared with a third-party assessment (clinical interview) there is no improvement of the accuracy of the indications. But it improves the transparency for the access to psycho-oncological interventions which may strengthen patient's autonomy and adherence. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28719921     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-113438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol        ISSN: 0937-2032


  3 in total

Review 1.  Symptoms During Outpatient Cancer Treatment and Options for Their Management

Authors:  Mitra Tewes; Freerk Baumann; Martin Teufel; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  What if… I Asked Cancer Patients About Psychological Distress? Barriers in Psycho-Oncological Screening From the Perspective of Nurses-A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Lara Dreismann; Alina Goretzki; Viktoria Ginger; Tanja Zimmermann
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Cancer-Related Distress: How Often Does It Co-occur With a Mental Disorder? - Results of a Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Jochen Ernst; Michael Friedrich; Sigrun Vehling; Uwe Koch; Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.