Literature DB >> 28719560

Perioperative and Delayed Major Complications Following Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Carrie E Bartley1, Burt Yaszay, Tracey P Bastrom, Suken A Shah, Baron S Lonner, Jahangir Asghar, Firoz Miyanji, Amer Samdani, Peter O Newton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reporting accurate surgical complication rates to patients and their families is important in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In this study, we report the rate of major complications following the surgical treatment of AIS both in the perioperative period and among patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.
METHODS: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of a multicenter registry of patients who underwent surgical treatment of AIS during the period of 1995 to 2014 in order to identify all complications. A complication was defined as "major" if it resulted in reoperation or in spinal cord or nerve root injury, or was life-threatening. A total of 3,582 patients with preoperative and early postoperative data (4 to 6 weeks of follow-up) were included. A subset of 2,220 patients with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up comprised the cohort for delayed complications. Overall complication rates were calculated, as was the percentage of complications according to the year of the index surgery and type of surgical approach.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 3,582 patients at the time of surgery was 14.8 ± 2.2 years. The average major curve magnitude was 56° ± 13° for thoracic curves and 51° ± 11° for lumbar. In 365 patients, anterior spinal fusion (ASF) with instrumentation was performed, and in 3,217 patients, posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with instrumentation was performed; 142 patients in the PSF group underwent concomitant anterior release. There were 192 major complications, with 93 (2.6%) occurring perioperatively. Perioperative complications included wound-related (1.0% of the patients), neurologic (0.5%), pulmonary (0.4%), instrumentation-related (0.4%), and gastrointestinal (0.2%) complications. One patient died. The mean annual perioperative major complication rate based on the year of surgery ranged from 0% to 10.5%. The complication rate by surgical approach was 3.0% for ASF and 2.6% for PSF (2.4% for PSF only and 5.6% for PSF with anterior release). The major complication rate for the 2,220 patients with at least 2 years of follow-up was 4.1%; all but 1 had a reoperation (4.1%). The majority of these major complications were wound and instrumentation-related (1.9% and 0.8%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: After surgery for AIS, a 2.6% rate of perioperative major complications and a 4.1% rate of major complications at 2 or more years after surgery can be anticipated. The complication rate decreased over the period of study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28719560     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  Long noncoding RNA lncAIS downregulation in mesenchymal stem cells is implicated in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Qianyu Zhuang; Buqing Ye; Shangyi Hui; Ying Du; Robert Chunhua Zhao; Jing Li; Zhihong Wu; Na Li; Yanbin Zhang; Hongling Li; Shengru Wang; Yang Yang; Shugang Li; Hong Zhao; Zusen Fan; Guixing Qiu; Jianguo Zhang
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Predictive value of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Wengang Wang; Tailong Chen; Yibin Liu; Songsong Wang; Ningning Yang; Ming Luo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Risk Factors of Total Blood Loss and Hidden Blood Loss in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Xiangyu Li; Wenyuan Ding; Ruoyu Zhao; Sidong Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Should all paediatric patients with presumed idiopathic scoliosis undergo MRI screening for neuro-axial disease?

Authors:  Patrick A Tully; Ben A Edwards; Omar Mograby; Harriet S M Davis; Oluwole Arieskola; Shailendra Magdum; Prashanth Rao; Jayaratnam Jayamohan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  The importance of curve severity, type and instrumentation strategy in the surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an in silico clinical trial on 64 cases.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Andrea Cina; Matteo Panico; Tito Bassani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Perioperative outcome and complications following single-staged Posterior Spinal Fusion (PSF) using pedicle screw instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): a review of 1057 cases from a single centre.

Authors:  Mun Keong Kwan; Kwong Weng Loh; Weng Hong Chung; Chee Kidd Chiu; Mohd Shahnaz Hasan; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Early operative morbidity in 184 cases of anterior vertebral body tethering.

Authors:  James Meyers; Lily Eaker; Theodor Di Pauli von Treuheim; Sergei Dolgovpolov; Baron Lonner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Use of intraoperative navigation for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery is safe to consider.

Authors:  Harold G Moore; Andre M Samuel; Patrick J Burroughs; Neil Pathak; Dominick A Tuason; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-06

Review 9.  Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Complications.

Authors:  Omar A Al-Mohrej; Sahar S Aldakhil; Mohammed A Al-Rabiah; Anwar M Al-Rabiah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-24

Review 10.  Modified Clavien-Dindo-sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Ndéye F Guissé; Joseph D Stone; Lukas G Keil; Tracey P Bastrom; Mark A Erickson; Burt Yaszay; Patrick J Cahill; Stefan Parent; Peter G Gabos; Peter O Newton; Michael P Glotzbecker; Michael P Kelly; Joshua M Pahys; Nicholas D Fletcher
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-08-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.