Literature DB >> 28719479

A Simulation-Based Quality Improvement Initiative Improves Pediatric Readiness in Community Hospitals.

Travis Whitfill1, Marcie Gawel, Marc Auerbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Pediatric Readiness Project Pediatric Readiness Survey (PRS) measured pediatric readiness in 4149 US emergency departments (EDs) and noted an average score of 69 on a 100-point scale. This readiness score consists of 6 domains: coordination of pediatric patient care (19/100), physician/nurse staffing and training (10/100), quality improvement activities (7/100), patient safety initiatives (14/100), policies and procedures (17/100), and availability of pediatric equipment (33/100). We aimed to assess and improve pediatric emergency readiness scores across Connecticut's hospitals.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the National Pediatric Readiness Project readiness score before and after an in situ simulation-based assessment and quality improvement program in Connecticut hospitals.
METHODS: We leveraged in situ simulations to measure the quality of resuscitative care provided by interprofessional teams to 3 simulated patients (infant septic shock, infant seizure, and child cardiac arrest) presenting to their ED resuscitation bay. Assessments of EDs were made based on a composite quality score that was measured as the sum of 4 distinct domains: (1) adherence to sepsis guidelines, (2) adherence to cardiac arrest guidelines, (3) performance on seizure resuscitation, and (4) teamwork. After the simulation, a detailed report with scores, comparisons to other EDs, and a gap analysis were provided to sites. Based on this report, a regional children's hospital team worked collaboratively with each ED to develop action items and a timeline for improvements. The National Pediatric Readiness Project PRS scores, the primary outcome of this study, were measured before and after participation.
RESULTS: Twelve community EDs in Connecticut participated in this project. The PRS scores were assessed before and after the intervention (simulation-based assessment and gap analysis/report-out). The average time between PRS assessments was 21 months. The PRS scores significantly improved 12.9% from the first assessment (mean ± SEM = 64 ± 4.4) to the second assessment (77 ± 4.0, P = 0.022). The PRS score domains also showed improvements in coordination of pediatric patient care (median improvement, 50%), quality improvement activities (median improvement, 79%), patient safety initiatives (mean improvement, 7%), policies and procedures (mean improvement, 17%), and availability of pediatric equipment (mean improvement, 7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a simulation-based quality improvement collaborative was associated with improvements in pediatric readiness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28719479     DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care        ISSN: 0749-5161            Impact factor:   1.454


  9 in total

1.  Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Mortality in Critically Ill Children.

Authors:  Stefanie G Ames; Billie S Davis; Jennifer R Marin; Ericka L Fink; Lenora M Olson; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Tracheal Intubations for Critically Ill Children Outside Specialized Centers in the United Kingdom-Patient, Provider, Practice Factors, and Adverse Events.

Authors:  Ron Sanders; Lauren Edwards; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness and Potentially Avoidable Transfers.

Authors:  Monica K Lieng; James P Marcin; Parul Dayal; Daniel J Tancredi; Morgan B Swanson; Sarah C Haynes; Patrick S Romano; Ilana S Sigal; Jennifer L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Impact of a Multidisciplinary Sepsis Initiative on Knowledge and Behavior in a Pediatric Center.

Authors:  Ryan K Breuer; Amanda B Hassinger
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 5.  Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review.

Authors:  Jennifer Truchot; Valérie Boucher; Winny Li; Guillaume Martel; Eva Jouhair; Éliane Raymond-Dufresne; Andrew Petrosoniak; Marcel Emond
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Evaluation of baseline pediatric readiness of emergency departments in Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Alex Aregbesola; Oana Florescu; Clara Tam; Amanda Coyle; Lisa Knisley; Kaitlin Hogue; Darcy Beer; Scott Sawyer; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-10-10

7.  A Standardized Protocol to Improve Acute Seizure Management in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Sara Pavitt; Alison Carley; Brenda Porter; Juliet K Knowles
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-08

8.  Closing the Loop: Program Description and Qualitative Analysis of a Pediatric Posttransfer Follow-up and Feedback Program.

Authors:  Michael P Goldman; Lindsey A Query; Ambrose H Wong; Isabel T Gross; Beth L Emerson; Marc A Auerbach; Gunjan K Tiyyagura
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.454

9.  Community-based in situ simulation: bringing simulation to the masses.

Authors:  Barbara M Walsh; Marc A Auerbach; Marcie N Gawel; Linda L Brown; Bobbi J Byrne; Aaron Calhoun
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2019-12-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.