Quanmeng Liu1, Qinzhou Wang, Hongen Liu, William K K Wu, Matthew T V Chan. 1. aDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region bShandong Provincial Hospital cDepartment of Neurology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University dBinzhou People's Hospital, Shandong eDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences fDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intraoperative changes in somatosensory (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) may indicate potential injury to the spinal cord and will require timely intervention to prevent permanent damage. This review focuses on the validity of currently recommended warning criteria for intraoperative evoked potential monitoring. RECENT FINDINGS: Current guideline recommends a decrease in SEP amplitude by 50% and MEP amplitude by 50-100% as warning signals for injury to the ascending sensory and descending motor pathway, respectively. On the basis of cohort studies, the diagnostic accuracy of SEP and MEP to predict postoperative neurologic deficits was variable. Importantly, 0.1-4.1% of monitored patients suffered postoperative neurologic deficit despite apparently normal SEP and MEP recordings (i.e. false negative events). These data suggested that the true warning criteria may be lower than previously acknowledged. A systematic review of studies that reported changes in SEP or MEP monitoring and postoperative neurological outcome showed an association between changes in monitoring signals and postoperative neurological deficits. However, the confidence intervals were wide and it is not possible to determine a threshold value in SEP or MEP amplitude beyond which may indicate neurologic deficit. SUMMARY: Current recommendations for warning criteria during intraoperative evoked potential monitoring are empirically derived. Until a threshold that predicts spinal cord injury can be accurately determined, it remains difficult to define the clinical utility of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Intraoperative changes in somatosensory (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) may indicate potential injury to the spinal cord and will require timely intervention to prevent permanent damage. This review focuses on the validity of currently recommended warning criteria for intraoperative evoked potential monitoring. RECENT FINDINGS: Current guideline recommends a decrease in SEP amplitude by 50% and MEP amplitude by 50-100% as warning signals for injury to the ascending sensory and descending motor pathway, respectively. On the basis of cohort studies, the diagnostic accuracy of SEP and MEP to predict postoperative neurologic deficits was variable. Importantly, 0.1-4.1% of monitored patients suffered postoperative neurologic deficit despite apparently normal SEP and MEP recordings (i.e. false negative events). These data suggested that the true warning criteria may be lower than previously acknowledged. A systematic review of studies that reported changes in SEP or MEP monitoring and postoperative neurological outcome showed an association between changes in monitoring signals and postoperative neurological deficits. However, the confidence intervals were wide and it is not possible to determine a threshold value in SEP or MEP amplitude beyond which may indicate neurologic deficit. SUMMARY: Current recommendations for warning criteria during intraoperative evoked potential monitoring are empirically derived. Until a threshold that predicts spinal cord injury can be accurately determined, it remains difficult to define the clinical utility of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.
Authors: Qiu-An Lu; Ying-Song Wang; Jing-Ming Xie; Tao Li; Zhi-Yue Shi; Zhi-Shan Du; Ying Zhang; Zhi Zhao; Ni Bi Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2019-12-02