Literature DB >> 28718940

Changes in treatment and outcome of oesophageal cancer in Denmark between 2004 and 2013.

D W Kjaer1, H Larsson2, L B Svendsen3, L S Jensen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2003, care for patients with oesophageal cancer has been centralized in a few dedicated centres in Denmark. The aim of this study was to assess changes in the treatment and outcome of patients registered in a nationwide database.
METHODS: All patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer or cancer of the gastro-oesophageal junction who underwent oesophagectomy in Denmark between 2004 and 2013, and who were registered in the Danish clinical database of carcinomas in the oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction and stomach (DECV database) were included. Quality-of-care indicators, including number of lymph nodes removed, anastomotic leak rate, 30- and 90-day mortality, and 2- and 5-year overall survival, were assessed. To compare quality-of-care indicators over time, the relative risk (RR) was calculated using a multivariable log binomial regression model.
RESULTS: Some 6178 patients were included, of whom 1728 underwent oesophagectomy. The overall number of patients with 15 or more lymph nodes in the resection specimen increased from 38·1 per cent in 2004 to 88·7 per cent in 2013. The anastomotic leak rate decreased from 14·8 to 7·6 per cent (RR 0·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 1·01). The 30-day mortality rate decreased from 4·5 to 1·7 per cent (RR 0·51, 0·22 to 1·15) and the 90-day mortality rate from 11·0 to 2·9 per cent (RR 0·46, 0·26 to 0·82). There were no statistically significant changes in 2- or 5-year survival rates over time.
CONCLUSION: Indicators of quality of care have improved since the centralization of oesophageal cancer treatment in Denmark.
© 2017 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28718940     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification].

Authors:  A Schaible; T Schmidt; M Diener; U Hinz; P Sauer; D Wichmann; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Sora Ely; Amy Alabaster; Simon K Ashiku; Ashish Patel; Jeffrey B Velotta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  [Prognosis and survival of esophageal cancer in Cameroon: a prognostic study].

Authors:  Winnie Tatiana Bekolo Nga; Servais Albert Fiacre Bagnaka Eloumou; Jean Paul Ndamba Engbang; Esther Mbassi Dina Bell; Anne Marthe Maison Mayeh; Etienne Atenguena; Martin Essomba Biwole; Georges Barthélémy Nko'o Ayissi; Gabin Kenfack; Dominique Noah Noah; Henry Namme Luma; Albert Mouelle Sone; Paul Ndom; Elie Claude Ndjitoyap Ndam
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2019-05-31

4.  Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register.

Authors:  M Jeremiasen; G Linder; J Hedberg; L Lundell; O Björ; M Lindblad; J Johansson
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer-Indicators for quality in diagnostics and treatment].

Authors:  Jens Hoeppner; Patrick Sven Plum; Heinz Buhr; Ines Gockel; Dietmar Lorenz; Michael Ghadimi; Christiane Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.955

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.