PURPOSE: The design development of a small, hand held, battery operated, breath actuated inhaler as a drug/device platform for inhaled insulin posed a number of technical challenges. Our goal was to optimize lung deposition and distribution with aerosol generators producing 3-6 μm particle size distribution. METHODS: In silico modeling with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and in vitro testing of device components were assessed using an Alberta idealized adult airway (Copley, UK) to optimize mouthpiece and aerosol path design for dose delivered distal to the trachea. Human factors use testing was designed to determine the ability to perform inspiratory manuevers with LED guidance within target flow limits. In vivo testing with healthy normal subjects ofradiolabeled aerosol compared 2 breathing patterns for lung deposition efficiency, distribution, and subject preference. RESULTS: CFD demonstrated that flows ≤5 L/min and ≥15 L/min reduced the delivery efficiencg. Prototypes tested with inspiratory flow of 10 L/min provided up to 70% of dose delivered distal to the model throat with aerosols of 3 to 6 μm. Users guided by LED were able to inhale for 8-24 s with 5 s breath hold. Lung dose >70% with peripheral to central ratios >2.0 were achieved, with subject preference for the longer inspiratory time with breath hold. CONCLUSION: The device design phase integration led to a novel design and inspiratory pattern with greater levels of peripheral deposition than previously reported with commercial inhalers. The rationale and process of the application of these methods are described with implications for use in future device development.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The design development of a small, hand held, battery operated, breath actuated inhaler as a drug/device platform for inhaled insulin posed a number of technical challenges. Our goal was to optimize lung deposition and distribution with aerosol generators producing 3-6 μm particle size distribution. METHODS: In silico modeling with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and in vitro testing of device components were assessed using an Alberta idealized adult airway (Copley, UK) to optimize mouthpiece and aerosol path design for dose delivered distal to the trachea. Human factors use testing was designed to determine the ability to perform inspiratory manuevers with LED guidance within target flow limits. In vivo testing with healthy normal subjects of radiolabeled aerosol compared 2 breathing patterns for lung deposition efficiency, distribution, and subject preference. RESULTS:CFD demonstrated that flows ≤5 L/min and ≥15 L/min reduced the delivery efficiencg. Prototypes tested with inspiratory flow of 10 L/min provided up to 70% of dose delivered distal to the model throat with aerosols of 3 to 6 μm. Users guided by LED were able to inhale for 8-24 s with 5 s breath hold. Lung dose >70% with peripheral to central ratios >2.0 were achieved, with subject preference for the longer inspiratory time with breath hold. CONCLUSION: The device design phase integration led to a novel design and inspiratory pattern with greater levels of peripheral deposition than previously reported with commercial inhalers. The rationale and process of the application of these methods are described with implications for use in future device development.
Entities:
Keywords:
aerosol; breathing patterns; device design; human factors; inhaled insulin
Authors: Dennis Kim; Sunder Mudaliar; Sithipol Chinnapongse; Neelima Chu; Sarah M Boies; Trent Davis; Ayesh D Perera; Robert S Fishman; David A Shapiro; Robert Henry Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Janet B McGill; David Ahn; Steven V Edelman; C Rachel Kilpatrick; Tricia Santos Cavaiola Journal: Adv Ther Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Stephen Newman; William D Bennett; Martyn Biddiscombe; Sunalene G Devadason; Myrna B Dolovich; John Fleming; Sabine Haeussermann; Claudius Kietzig; Philip J Kuehl; Beth L Laube; Knut Sommerer; Glyn Taylor; Omar S Usmani; Kirby L Zeman Journal: J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.849