F Ülger1, M Pehlivanlar Küçük2, A O Küçük3, N K İlkaya1, N Murat4, B Bilgiç5, H Abanoz6. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division Of Intensive Care Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55100, Turkey. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division Of Intensive Care Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, 55100, Turkey. mehtap_phlvnlr@hotmail.com. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gazi State Hospital, 55100, Samsun, Turkey. 4. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55100, Samsun, Turkey. 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ege Umut Hospital, 45400, Manisa, Turkey. 6. Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gümüşhane State Hospital, 29000, Gümüşhane, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of AKI development on mortality with four different classification systems (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, KDIGO) in critically ill trauma patients followed in the intensive care unit. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2034 patients in our intensive care unit was conducted between July 2010 and August 2013. A total of 198 patients with primary trauma were included in the study to evaluate the development of AKI. RESULTS: When the presence of AKI was investigated according to the four criteria (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO), the highest incidence of AKI was found according to the KDIGO classification (74.2%), followed by AKIN (72.2%), RIFLE (69.7%), and CK (59.1%). It was observed that more AKI developed according to KDIGO in patients with multiple trauma and thoracic trauma (p = 0.031, p = 0.029). Sixty-two (31%) of the 198 trauma patients monitored in the intensive care unit died; mortality was frequently found high in AKI stage 2 and 3 patients. According to the CK classification, there was a significant increase in mortality in patients with AKI on the first day (p = 0.045). AKI classifications by RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO were independently associated with the risk of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of AKI was found to be an independent risk factor in the development of in-hospital mortality according to all classification systems (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO) in critically traumatic patients followed in ICU, and the compatibility between RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO was the highest among the classification systems.
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of AKI development on mortality with four different classification systems (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, KDIGO) in critically ill traumapatients followed in the intensive care unit. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2034 patients in our intensive care unit was conducted between July 2010 and August 2013. A total of 198 patients with primary trauma were included in the study to evaluate the development of AKI. RESULTS: When the presence of AKI was investigated according to the four criteria (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO), the highest incidence of AKI was found according to the KDIGO classification (74.2%), followed by AKIN (72.2%), RIFLE (69.7%), and CK (59.1%). It was observed that more AKI developed according to KDIGO in patients with multiple trauma and thoracic trauma (p = 0.031, p = 0.029). Sixty-two (31%) of the 198 traumapatients monitored in the intensive care unit died; mortality was frequently found high in AKI stage 2 and 3 patients. According to the CK classification, there was a significant increase in mortality in patients with AKI on the first day (p = 0.045). AKI classifications by RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO were independently associated with the risk of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: In this study, the presence of AKI was found to be an independent risk factor in the development of in-hospital mortality according to all classification systems (RIFLE, AKIN, CK, and KDIGO) in critically traumaticpatients followed in ICU, and the compatibility between RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO was the highest among the classification systems.
Authors: Xiaoxi Zeng; Gearoid M McMahon; Steven M Brunelli; David W Bates; Sushrut S Waikar Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Andrew K Roy; Catherine Mc Gorrian; Cecelia Treacy; Edel Kavanaugh; Alice Brennan; Niall G Mahon; Patrick T Murray Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Glenn M Chertow; Elisabeth Burdick; Melissa Honour; Joseph V Bonventre; David W Bates Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-09-21 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Carlos V R Brown; Joseph J Dubose; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Hakan Yanar; Ali Salim; Kenji Inaba; Peter Rhee; Linda Chan; Demetrios Demetriades Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: J A Morris; P Mucha; S E Ross; B F Moore; D B Hoyt; L Gentilello; J Landercasper; D V Feliciano; S R Shackford Journal: J Trauma Date: 1991-12
Authors: Ravindra L Mehta; John A Kellum; Sudhir V Shah; Bruce A Molitoris; Claudio Ronco; David G Warnock; Adeera Levin Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Gabrielle E Hatton; Reginald E Du; Claudia Pedroza; Shuyan Wei; John A Harvin; Kevin W Finkel; Charles E Wade; Lillian S Kao Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-09-20 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Belinda De Simone; Luca Ansaloni; Massimo Sartelli; Federica Gaiani; Gioacchino Leandro; Gian Luigi De' Angelis; Francesco Di Mario; Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena Journal: Acta Biomed Date: 2018-12-17
Authors: Ashraf O Oweis; Sameeha A Alshelleh; Suleiman M Momany; Shaher M Samrah; Basheer Y Khassawneh; Musa A K Al Ali Journal: Crit Care Res Pract Date: 2020-07-30
Authors: Michael Niemantsverdriet; Meriem Khairoun; Ayman El Idrissi; Romy Koopsen; Imo Hoefer; Wouter van Solinge; Jan Willem Uffen; Domenico Bellomo; Wouter Tiel Groenestege; Karin Kaasjager; Saskia Haitjema Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 2.388