E Sens1, M Mothes-Lasch1, J F Lutz2. 1. Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Schmerztherapie, Zentralklink Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Deutschland. 2. Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Schmerztherapie, Zentralklink Bad Berka, Robert-Koch-Allee 9, 99437, Bad Berka, Deutschland. info.schmerztherapie@zentralklinik.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is characterized by a complex interaction of somatic, mental and social factors. Assessing these factors in patients with chronic pain is vital during the diagnostic work-up and when making a structured treatment plan. Interdisciplinary pain assessment (ISA) is the most promising method to deal with these challenges. This article presents our experience in performing pain assessments in the hospital setting and also illustrates the characteristic features of chronic pain patients undergoing such assessments. METHODS: This study reviews and evaluates patient data from 2704 ISAs performed at the Interdisciplinary Pain Centre of the Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany, between 2008 and 2015. RESULTS: The majority of our ISA patients are severely handicapped and show distinct signs of chronic disease. A large proportion of patients is either unable to work or receiving benefits (invalidity pension or retirement pension). In addition, patients reported long disease durations and high emotional distress. Treatment recommendations were based on the patients' individual clinical presentations and examination results. More than half of the patients required multimodal pain management, while adjustments or therapeutic withdrawal of pain medications, in particular of opioids, were indicated in many patients. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that ISA enables fast, high-quality diagnostic assessments of chronic pain while taking the biopsychosocial model of pain in particular into account. In addition, ISA is not biased with regard to outcome results and recommends the further treatment that appears best for the individual patient. ISA leads not only to inpatient treatment, but also to treatment in other therapeutic settings and, as such, is not merely a door-opener to multimodal pain therapy.
BACKGROUND:Chronic pain is characterized by a complex interaction of somatic, mental and social factors. Assessing these factors in patients with chronic pain is vital during the diagnostic work-up and when making a structured treatment plan. Interdisciplinary pain assessment (ISA) is the most promising method to deal with these challenges. This article presents our experience in performing pain assessments in the hospital setting and also illustrates the characteristic features of chronic painpatients undergoing such assessments. METHODS: This study reviews and evaluates patient data from 2704 ISAs performed at the Interdisciplinary Pain Centre of the Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Germany, between 2008 and 2015. RESULTS: The majority of our ISA patients are severely handicapped and show distinct signs of chronic disease. A large proportion of patients is either unable to work or receiving benefits (invalidity pension or retirement pension). In addition, patients reported long disease durations and high emotional distress. Treatment recommendations were based on the patients' individual clinical presentations and examination results. More than half of the patients required multimodal pain management, while adjustments or therapeutic withdrawal of pain medications, in particular of opioids, were indicated in many patients. DISCUSSION: Our study shows that ISA enables fast, high-quality diagnostic assessments of chronic pain while taking the biopsychosocial model of pain in particular into account. In addition, ISA is not biased with regard to outcome results and recommends the further treatment that appears best for the individual patient. ISA leads not only to inpatient treatment, but also to treatment in other therapeutic settings and, as such, is not merely a door-opener to multimodal pain therapy.
Authors: H-R Casser; B Arnold; T Brinkschmidt; I Gralow; D Irnich; K Klimczyk; B Nagel; M Pfingsten; M Schiltenwolf; R Sittl; W Söllner Journal: Schmerz Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Roger Chou; Gilbert J Fanciullo; Perry G Fine; Jeremy A Adler; Jane C Ballantyne; Pamela Davies; Marilee I Donovan; David A Fishbain; Kathy M Foley; Jeffrey Fudin; Aaron M Gilson; Alexander Kelter; Alexander Mauskop; Patrick G O'Connor; Steven D Passik; Gavril W Pasternak; Russell K Portenoy; Ben A Rich; Richard G Roberts; Knox H Todd; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Kevin E Vowles; Mindy L McEntee; Peter Siyahhan Julnes; Tessa Frohe; John P Ney; David N van der Goes Journal: Pain Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: M Pfingsten; B Arnold; A Böger; T Brinkschmidt; H-R Casser; D Irnich; U Kaiser; K Klimczyk; J Lutz; M Schiltenwolf; D Seeger; B Zernikow; R Sabatowski Journal: Schmerz Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.107